For me the most interesting is to grab warnings. Like you you cannot miss errors :-) The problem is that we cannot just display warnings because we loose the context where they occur (the module or any others details that might be in INFO level). Nowadays warnings are lost in too many logs and not often analyzed by developers
Arnaud On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Colour can grab your attention. Sometimes you don't want your attention > grabbed. A build log is quite often in my opinion a bad place to grab your > attention. That failure at the end will grab my attention just fine. > > There are times when I might like a colourised log... But more often I > prefer to be able to just change the logging levels, or use the terminal's > find feature > > On Friday, 7 December 2012, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Do you still watch TV in black and white? ;) > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Jesse McConnell > > <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>wrote: > > > > > I sure hope colored logging is off by default, I hate it :) > > > > > > -- > > > jesse mcconnell > > > jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Connolly < > > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I am -1 on coloured logger in 3.1.0 though given the number of > commits > > to > > > > core coming from me I am fine to state this is not a veto rather a > very > > > > strong preference. > > > > > > > > I am fine with proofing the coloured logger changes before releasing > > > 3.1.0 > > > > to ensure that we have logging right but in my view user visible > > changes > > > > make API changes more solid so I am less keen to couple them. > > > > > > > > The logging changes are big enough for a separate release. I think > > users > > > > will thank us for being cautious before putting coloured logging on > top > > > > > > > > My €0.02 > > > > > > > > - Stephen > > > > > > > > On Friday, 7 December 2012, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's not about rush, it is about touching the Logging Framework > while > > > for > > > > > the majority of the end-users it won't make that much of a > > difference. > > > > > I'm thinking what would make it interesting for me as an end-user > to > > > use > > > > > this next release (apart from the bugfixes). We could already log > and > > > > > control the logging-level. Now colors would make it more > interesting, > > > > even > > > > > if we could provide it as an extension (not part of core), as long > as > > > it > > > > > works. > > > > > Sure, for the specialists these changes offer new opportunities, > but > > > > > that's a small group. > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:18:50 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl < > > > ja...@tesla.io > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 7, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If 3.1.0 is going to be the "New Logger"-release, I'd prefer to > > > include > > > > > the colored logger as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not putting it in the release because I'm not, without > discussion > > > > > > > > > > 1) Putting 3 logging implementations into the distribution > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > 2) Putting an immature logging implementation as the default > > > > > > > > > > Not something to be taken lightly and it's been 11 months at this > > point > > > > so > > > > > what's the rush? > > > > > > > > > > That would make it more complete. Also, if coloring would require > > > extra > > > > > adjustments to the logging framework then now is the time. (it > seems > > to > > > > > work out of the box, but we have to be sure.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Op Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:04:13 +0100 schreef Benson Margulies < > > > > > bimargul...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > As I see it, the vote bogged down because Kristian found problems, > > and > > > > > I haven't seen clear evidence that those problems are sorted out. > I'd > > > > > be happy to vote +1 with respect to all the design questions for > the > > > > > release 'as is'. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > good idea, Benson. > > > > > > > > > > Btw, this VOTE did not get enough +1 in more than a week. And this > is > > > not > > > > > because not enough people took care if you look at the plenty of > > > comments > > > > > in the thread. > > > > > > > > > > 1.) Do people have any technical comment on my proposal to > introduce > > a > > > > new > > > > > plugin-plugin flag for exposing slf4j? Is there any technical > problem > > -- > > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <javascript:;> | ggreg...@apache.org > <javascript:;> > > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
