Hi, On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater than that is impossible for me atm.
Regards, ~ Simon On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > >> regarding tree visitor, this may help: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 >> >> Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to what I have... > I assume there wont be too much which I still can integrated in the > PartialVisitContext since I am rather optimized already and bound by the > spec! > > > Werner > > > > > > -Matthias >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner Punz<werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Michael Concini schrieb: >>> >>>> Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done >>>> as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion >>>> around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list >>>> archives right now to check). Does anybody remember what the plan was >>>> with >>>> Google SoC? >>>> >>>> Interesting question, but I assume I only have a small subset of the >>> needed >>> functionality implemented, the one we need for PPR so, >>> I will commit my tomorrow as soon as I have tested it, whoever wants to >>> do >>> something in GSOC can pick it up and refine it. But have in mind, my work >>> currently only coveres the area of providing a PartialVisitContext so >>> that I >>> have a complete state for PPR in this area! >>> If someone comes with a better solution I dont have any problem dropping >>> the >>> code again ;-) >>> >>> >>> Werner >>> >>> >>> >>> Werner Punz wrote: >>>> >>>>> Michael Concini schrieb: >>>>> >>>>>> All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I thought it might be a good time to raise the issue of solidifying a >>>>>> plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now that we've had a little >>>>>> time to >>>>>> work with the release candidate draft of the spec. What are the >>>>>> thoughts in >>>>>> the community with respect to what should be included in an alpha >>>>>> release as >>>>>> well as what the time frame should be for a release. If we can come >>>>>> up with >>>>>> a target date as well as specific 2.0 features we want to target for >>>>>> inclusion, that should help in prioritizing the remaining work. >>>>>> From my end, I'd love to see a working runtime in some form by the >>>>>> end >>>>>> of August if that's reasonable. As for content, that is definitely >>>>>> more of >>>>>> an open question. Here is my top list of what I would like to see be >>>>>> at >>>>>> least partially functional for an alpha release. >>>>>> -backwards compatibility with JSF 1.x apps >>>>>> -base support for facelets and composite components >>>>>> -AJAX support (should hopefully be in pretty good shape here thanks to >>>>>> Ganesh and team) >>>>>> -System event support >>>>>> -Partial view traversal >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts/concerns/objections? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> None from my side not sure how far Ganesh is with his ajax tag! >>>>> The scripts already are in pretty good shape and functionalitywise well >>>>> ahead of the RI ;-) >>>>> >>>>> As for partial Tree traversal minor sidequestion? Has anyone started to >>>>> work on this, because I have started to implement the partial visit >>>>> context >>>>> (I have to recheck the jira for this, because I opened an issue for >>>>> this >>>>> under partial render response issue 2116/2241)! >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2241 >>>>> >>>>> I will commit my code around tomorrow, it is basically done >>>>> but needs some testing! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Werner >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >
