2009/6/18 Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> > Hi, > > Would be great to have a basic page getting through, so new tags and > partial stuff can be based upon it. Has anyone tried? >
> Implementation of f:ajax is based on client behaviour stuff. Have you > already started implementation (just to avoid duplicating it)? > Not yet. Right now I'm just reading the spec and the latest myfaces core code, trying to define pending tasks and what it is better to do at this time. Feel free to start working on it. I'll do some other tasks. regards Leonardo Uribe > > Best regards, > Ganesh > > Leonardo Uribe schrieb: > >> Hi >> >> Just as a brief review, this is an updated list about the state of myfaces >> core 2.0.0 branch: >> >> Pending tasks >> >> - Facelets PDL >> - Client behavior API (depends from facelets and composite component >> stuff) >> - Error handling API (and run through existing classes to make sure the >> new exception specification is enforced) >> - Partial view API >> - Partial State Saving >> - Add Flash scope >> - New tags (mostly linked to Facelets) >> - Unit tests (conversion shale -> myfaces code) >> >> Done tasks (some parts maybe requires testing or minor updates) >> >> - Resource API >> - Annotation support >> - h:outputScript and h:outputStyleSheet renderer >> - Config ordering >> - JavaScript API >> - Tree visiting API >> - SystemEvent API >> - New validators (Bean and regex mainly) >> - Utility methods (ExternalContext mainly) (requires testing) >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2009/6/9 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> >> >> Hi >> >> Good to hear that facelets part will be committed soon. I hope to >> start working on javax.faces.behavior api and continue contribute >> on other parts of myfaces core 2.0 (for example implement partial >> state saving) as soon as tomahawk be released (planned on next week). >> >> regards >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> 2009/6/9 Simon Lessard <simon.lessar...@gmail.com >> <mailto:simon.lessar...@gmail.com>> >> >> We use the Facelets codebase, we just have to rename the >> package (already done), use the HandlerDelegate ... thing ... >> and implement the Facelets VDL. Those are not part of >> "standard" Facelets with existing ASL 2.0 code. >> >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf >> <mat...@apache.org <mailto:mat...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh<gan...@j4fry.org >> <mailto:gan...@j4fry.org>> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed, >> >> correct >> >> > why do we reinvent them? >> >> they added stuff for JSF 2.0 >> >> e.g. <composite:interface> etc >> (but didn't put it into the Apache licensed version) >> >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Ganesh >> > >> > Simon Lessard schrieb: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part >> within 2 weeks, fater >> >> than that is impossible for me atm. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz >> <werner.p...@gmail.com <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com> >> >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> >> >> regarding tree visitor, this may help: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 >> >> >> >> Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to >> what I have... >> >> I assume there wont be too much which I still can >> integrated in >> >> the PartialVisitContext since I am rather optimized >> already and >> >> bound by the spec! >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner >> >> Punz<werner.p...@gmail.com >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com> >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> >> >> Wasn't there a plan to have some of the >> partial tree >> >> traversal work done >> >> as part of the Google Summer of Code? I >> seem to >> >> recall some discussion >> >> around this awhile back (don't have time >> to dig >> >> through the mailing list >> >> archives right now to check). Does >> anybody remember >> >> what the plan was with >> >> Google SoC? >> >> >> >> Interesting question, but I assume I only >> have a small >> >> subset of the needed >> >> functionality implemented, the one we need >> for PPR so, >> >> I will commit my tomorrow as soon as I have >> tested it, >> >> whoever wants to do >> >> something in GSOC can pick it up and refine >> it. But have >> >> in mind, my work >> >> currently only coveres the area of providing a >> >> PartialVisitContext so that I >> >> have a complete state for PPR in this area! >> >> If someone comes with a better solution I >> dont have any >> >> problem dropping the >> >> code again ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner Punz wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> >> >> All, >> >> >> >> I thought it might be a good >> time to raise the >> >> issue of solidifying a >> >> plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha >> release now >> >> that we've had a little time to >> >> work with the release candidate >> draft of the >> >> spec. What are the thoughts in >> >> the community with respect to >> what should be >> >> included in an alpha release as >> >> well as what the time frame >> should be for a >> >> release. If we can come up with >> >> a target date as well as >> specific 2.0 features >> >> we want to target for >> >> inclusion, that should help in >> prioritizing >> >> the remaining work. >> >> From my end, I'd love to see a >> working >> >> runtime in some form by the end >> >> of August if that's reasonable. >> As for >> >> content, that is definitely more of >> >> an open question. Here is my top >> list of what >> >> I would like to see be at >> >> least partially functional for >> an alpha release. >> >> -backwards compatibility with >> JSF 1.x apps >> >> -base support for facelets and >> composite >> >> components >> >> -AJAX support (should hopefully >> be in pretty >> >> good shape here thanks to >> >> Ganesh and team) >> >> -System event support >> >> -Partial view traversal >> >> >> >> Thoughts/concerns/objections? >> >> >> >> -Mike >> >> >> >> None from my side not sure how far >> Ganesh is with >> >> his ajax tag! >> >> The scripts already are in pretty >> good shape and >> >> functionalitywise well >> >> ahead of the RI ;-) >> >> >> >> As for partial Tree traversal minor >> sidequestion? >> >> Has anyone started to >> >> work on this, because I have started >> to implement >> >> the partial visit context >> >> (I have to recheck the jira for >> this, because I >> >> opened an issue for this >> >> under partial render response issue >> 2116/2241)! >> >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2241 >> >> >> >> I will commit my code around >> tomorrow, it is >> >> basically done >> >> but needs some testing! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> >> >> >>
