On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Ganesh<gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed,
correct > why do we reinvent them? they added stuff for JSF 2.0 e.g. <composite:interface> etc (but didn't put it into the Apache licensed version) > > Best regards, > Ganesh > > Simon Lessard schrieb: >> >> Hi, >> >> On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater >> than that is impossible for me atm. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> ~ Simon >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com >> <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> regarding tree visitor, this may help: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 >> >> Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to what I have... >> I assume there wont be too much which I still can integrated in >> the PartialVisitContext since I am rather optimized already and >> bound by the spec! >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> -Matthias >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner >> Punz<werner.p...@gmail.com <mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree >> traversal work done >> as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to >> recall some discussion >> around this awhile back (don't have time to dig >> through the mailing list >> archives right now to check). Does anybody remember >> what the plan was with >> Google SoC? >> >> Interesting question, but I assume I only have a small >> subset of the needed >> functionality implemented, the one we need for PPR so, >> I will commit my tomorrow as soon as I have tested it, >> whoever wants to do >> something in GSOC can pick it up and refine it. But have >> in mind, my work >> currently only coveres the area of providing a >> PartialVisitContext so that I >> have a complete state for PPR in this area! >> If someone comes with a better solution I dont have any >> problem dropping the >> code again ;-) >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> Werner Punz wrote: >> >> Michael Concini schrieb: >> >> All, >> >> I thought it might be a good time to raise the >> issue of solidifying a >> plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now >> that we've had a little time to >> work with the release candidate draft of the >> spec. What are the thoughts in >> the community with respect to what should be >> included in an alpha release as >> well as what the time frame should be for a >> release. If we can come up with >> a target date as well as specific 2.0 features >> we want to target for >> inclusion, that should help in prioritizing >> the remaining work. >> From my end, I'd love to see a working >> runtime in some form by the end >> of August if that's reasonable. As for >> content, that is definitely more of >> an open question. Here is my top list of what >> I would like to see be at >> least partially functional for an alpha release. >> -backwards compatibility with JSF 1.x apps >> -base support for facelets and composite >> components >> -AJAX support (should hopefully be in pretty >> good shape here thanks to >> Ganesh and team) >> -System event support >> -Partial view traversal >> >> Thoughts/concerns/objections? >> >> -Mike >> >> None from my side not sure how far Ganesh is with >> his ajax tag! >> The scripts already are in pretty good shape and >> functionalitywise well >> ahead of the RI ;-) >> >> As for partial Tree traversal minor sidequestion? >> Has anyone started to >> work on this, because I have started to implement >> the partial visit context >> (I have to recheck the jira for this, because I >> opened an issue for this >> under partial render response issue 2116/2241)! >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2241 >> >> I will commit my code around tomorrow, it is >> basically done >> but needs some testing! >> >> >> >> Werner >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
