+1 for the rename. Sooner the better if we’re going to go ahead with this one.
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: > > :) > > Hey all - > > I wanted to get a few more opinions on this. We're going to need to change > some repositories around on the newt/newtmgr side (Chris/Todd, can you send a > summary to the list?) > > I'd like to get this all done at once. I don't think we need a formal vote > on this one, but just lazy consensus. My suggestion is that Chris send a > summary of the go changes, and we leave this open till Sunday. If anyone has > objections before then, we can stop & vote. > > Also, we have our last few features/changes coming in this week. So, we > should uncharacteristically have a few days to poke around at the release > prior to releasing B2. > > Sterling > > > On 3/3/16 4:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Maintaining the precedent also becomes more painful as >> things move forward :) >> >>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Awhile ago we decided to be cute about naming things: eggs, eggshells, >>> clutches, etc. One holdover from this was larva: our main package >>> repository, which includes the OS and most of the packages. >>> >>> While its painful to rename the git repo: it's only going to get more >>> painful as we move forward. Do we think it makes sense to make it clearer, >>> and rename this to apache-mynewt-os or apache-mynewt-main? >>> >>> Sterling >>
