[ ] apache-mynewt-mynewt [ ] apache-mynewt-os [+1] apache-mynewt-core [ ] apache-mynewt-main
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 5:42 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: > > oh, and please specify your preferred option: > > [ ] apache-mynewt-mynewt > [ ] apache-mynewt-os > [ ] apache-mynewt-core > [ ] apache-mynewt-main > > Mine is apache-mynewt-mynewt, since this really is the "mynewt" portion of > the mynewt project. > > For efficiencies sake, unless noted otherwise, by +1 you are saying "I am > fine with all of these options", and then expressing a preference for a > particular one. If you feel strongly about any of these, please call it out. > > Sterling > > On 3/3/16 5:38 PM, will sanfilippo wrote: >> +1 >> >> >>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 4:24 PM, marko kiiskila <ma...@runtime.io> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for the rename. Sooner the better if we’re going to go ahead with this >>> one. >>> >>>> On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> :) >>>> >>>> Hey all - >>>> >>>> I wanted to get a few more opinions on this. We're going to need to >>>> change some repositories around on the newt/newtmgr side (Chris/Todd, can >>>> you send a summary to the list?) >>>> >>>> I'd like to get this all done at once. I don't think we need a formal >>>> vote on this one, but just lazy consensus. My suggestion is that Chris >>>> send a summary of the go changes, and we leave this open till Sunday. If >>>> anyone has objections before then, we can stop & vote. >>>> >>>> Also, we have our last few features/changes coming in this week. So, we >>>> should uncharacteristically have a few days to poke around at the release >>>> prior to releasing B2. >>>> >>>> Sterling >>>> >>>> >>>> On 3/3/16 4:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>> Maintaining the precedent also becomes more painful as >>>>> things move forward :) >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Howdy, >>>>>> >>>>>> Awhile ago we decided to be cute about naming things: eggs, eggshells, >>>>>> clutches, etc. One holdover from this was larva: our main package >>>>>> repository, which includes the OS and most of the packages. >>>>>> >>>>>> While its painful to rename the git repo: it's only going to get more >>>>>> painful as we move forward. Do we think it makes sense to make it >>>>>> clearer, and rename this to apache-mynewt-os or apache-mynewt-main? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sterling >>>>> >>> >>
