+1
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 4:24 PM, marko kiiskila <ma...@runtime.io> wrote: > > +1 for the rename. Sooner the better if we’re going to go ahead with this one. > >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> :) >> >> Hey all - >> >> I wanted to get a few more opinions on this. We're going to need to change >> some repositories around on the newt/newtmgr side (Chris/Todd, can you send >> a summary to the list?) >> >> I'd like to get this all done at once. I don't think we need a formal vote >> on this one, but just lazy consensus. My suggestion is that Chris send a >> summary of the go changes, and we leave this open till Sunday. If anyone has >> objections before then, we can stop & vote. >> >> Also, we have our last few features/changes coming in this week. So, we >> should uncharacteristically have a few days to poke around at the release >> prior to releasing B2. >> >> Sterling >> >> >> On 3/3/16 4:09 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Maintaining the precedent also becomes more painful as >>> things move forward :) >>> >>>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 6:28 PM, Sterling Hughes <sterl...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Howdy, >>>> >>>> Awhile ago we decided to be cute about naming things: eggs, eggshells, >>>> clutches, etc. One holdover from this was larva: our main package >>>> repository, which includes the OS and most of the packages. >>>> >>>> While its painful to rename the git repo: it's only going to get more >>>> painful as we move forward. Do we think it makes sense to make it >>>> clearer, and rename this to apache-mynewt-os or apache-mynewt-main? >>>> >>>> Sterling >>> >
