On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 19:50 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > In every FOSS project history has its importance. As a matter of fact, > did you know that Daniel was willing to become the documentation project > lead? He wasn't elected. Then he created OOoAuthors. And then he changed > the licence, while not explaining to the OOoAuthors members the > consequence for this.
I'd say that is libelous, Charles. Its not only factually incorrect, it is said in such a way to try and make Daniel look as bad as possible. You should be ashamed of yourself. You are supposed to be a project leader, show at least a little maturity. > I cannot of course read Daniel's mind. Actually you have never ever met him yet you seem to be determined that you know all about him and his motives. Well I have met him and in my judgement his over-riding motive is the success of OOo. You might not like him speaking his mind but what happened to freedom of speech? I don't agree with everything Daniel says, but I strongly defend his right to say it without reservation. > But I can watch his moves. And you know what? He's everything but > somebody who needs "management", as Ian keeps telling me. Daniel has an > agenda. Now, as I keep saying myself, You are paranoid and have no management experience so your response is predictable. Seems to me you are just out of your depth. > Second, if you have problems, try > to fix the documentation project, and if you can't, then go complain to > the Community Council. As far as I know, the only person democratically elected by community members to the community council in recent times was ....Daniel. Still its not really a democracy is it? -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMSL --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
