On 7/17/05, Charles-H.Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 20:55 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> > > The intent of OOoAuthors is to attract as much people as
> > > possible by trying to be appealing to advanced users as well as
> > > newcomers.
> >
> > Uhmm... is that a bad thing? I'd think it'd be good.
> 
> Well, it is a bad thing in the sense that you are trying to take people
> away from OOo, the ".org", the community if which you're supposed to be
> a representative. It's good to do this in a business context for
> instance, but not in a community context where we (altogether) are
> supposed to build a community, not fragment it.
> >

It this better to lose people at all? In OOoAuthors they can
contribute using simple and familiar interface. When they do not have
such a possibilty, they will just give up.
Programmers of course dont need such a intermediate buffer, users do.

-- 
Ain Vagula

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to