This discussion is really on the wrong thread. It should by on the
*[CALL for TOP Down workflow Requirements]* thread. I have forward
every relevant email and document that I can find to the thread. This
conversation belongs on that thread in the proper context as well.
On 12/21/2019 2:30 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
Those people with devops should coordinate in another thread and make
proposals for top-level functional to the broader audience.
We have enough smart and disciplined people here, I think we can do this.
We should be able to spec from the top-level (no tool speak) process down the
the nitty-gritty. And if we stratify the details, the resultant docs should be
welcoming to all.
I’d like to give it a go. Anyone up for this?
I don't believe it is a difficult job. I think it is like one or two
hours of work for a straw man. And unless there is fundamental
tool/implementation problem, I don't thing that you need to delve
deeply into git or github. I think the workflow is really pretty
trivial.
1. Receive patches or PRs and put on a branch
2. Make sure that they conform to the coding standard
3. [FUTURE] make sure that they conform to Apache licensing
requirements.
4. Make sure that they don't break the build (trickier than it sounds)
5. [FUTURE] perform hardware- or simulator-in-loop testing to check
for regressions
6. Final review for architectural correctness and conformance to
standard. Make sure that the change follow same pattern as other
instances (if applicable)
7. Merge the change in master
Oh, damn! I just did the job. :-) From my point of view, the is
about 80% of the workflow. The rest is all the caveats and what to
do if a step fails which will require more words.
It would be best to have a place where we can collaborate on a
document. Something like Google Drive. Apache, however, is very
particular about everything happening in the open. When asked,
Justin, one of our mentors, recommended that we put the collaborative
document in the Nuttx Confluence. As I mentioned to Brennan earlier,
it would be good to have a page outside of the User Wiki to hold
project documents... a Project Wiki. But that hasn't stirred up any
response.
I think we have all become a little jaded :-(
Having a fresh point of view would be great!
Greg
