Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Was not delegator methods thought to hide SQL code ? I think that David meant > to prune not to replace. In both case such a changes > implie > major tedious refactoring. Though using deprecated concept it could be > carried on carefully in time...
I don't think you understand. You wouldn't be writing sql to the raw jdbc. You'd be writing an Ofbiz sql dialect. Ofbiz would then translate that on the fly to the correct underlying form.
