De : "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > Was not delegator methods thought to hide SQL code ? I think that David > > meant to prune not to replace. In both case such a changes > > implie > > major tedious refactoring. Though using deprecated concept it could be > > carried on carefully in time... > > I don't think you understand.
Mmm..., do you think so ? > > You wouldn't be writing sql to the raw jdbc. You'd be writing an Ofbiz > sql dialect. Ofbiz would then translate that on the fly to the correct > underlying form. In your example the difference is very light ! Jacques
