Hi David,

as I wasn't really sure about what to answer to your question, i looked a bit 
around:
http://geocoder.us/blog/2006/03/23/how-many-digits-are-enough/
if their data is correct: 0.000001 degrees are 4.37184 inch or 11.1044736 
centimeters
that ought to be enough for everyone ;-)

seriously: I think for applications like mapping out addresses that should be 
enough for years, but there may be other use cases i can't imagine right now.

--Roland


On Tuesday 01 July 2008 21:21, David E Jones wrote:
> Thanks for your comments Roland. I agree now that using a floating
> point number is the best way to store them.
>
> Right now we kind of "hack" floating point numbers for most databases,
> ie we actually use a fixed-point number with only 6 decimal places.
>
> I'm guessing for something like lat/long coordinates we'll want more
> than 6 decimal places, so we might need to introduce a new field type
> for this (which isn't difficult).
>
>  From your experience how many digits of precision within a degree is
> needed for good lat/long coordinates?
>
> -David
>
> On Jun 28, 2008, at 2:53 PM, RolandH wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > just to comment on formating:
> > please save lat/long in degrees and use float or numeric types for
> > that, because with that you may do perimeter searches with db support:
> > Having point P with lat/long and a radius, you can select all other
> > points from db which are within a square (center is P) supported by
> > indices of you're db. Afterwards you have only a limited set to
> > check against the radius again.
> > If you're database supports sin() / cos() you may take a look here
> > http://earthcode.com/blog/2006/11/hey_want_to_sort_your_query_by.html and
> > do everything with sql :)
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Roland
> >
> > David E Jones wrote:
> >> The idea of having more generic lat/long coordinates is
> >> interesting. For example, we could:
> >>
> >> 1. add lat/long fields to ContactMech
> >> 2. create a new ContactMechType for geo-spatial coordinates like
> >> this, like "TerrestrialPosition" or something
> >> 3. add a new entity for TerrestrialPosition that is independent of
> >> the ContactMech and Geo entities, and then related to with other
> >> entities
> >>
> >> We also need to discuss how to format these. They will probably
> >> need to be string/text values so we can store these in any
> >> database, so do we want the degrees/minutes/seconds/sub-seconds
> >> format, or the degress/minutes/sub-minutes format, or the degrees/
> >> sub-degrees format, or something else?
> >>
> >> Also, I'm wondering if there is a good open source java library for
> >> handling these, or even a standard object in the Java API (I'm not
> >> aware of one, but haven't looked either). It would be nice to have
> >> something to parse and normalize the strings and such, and of
> >> course do calculations for distance or to see if a coordinate is
> >> within a certain area, etc.
> >>
> >> Jacques: for your needs now you might want to consider using extend-
> >> entity if your timeline is tight. I'm guessing this needs more
> >> discussion and research, etc before we get something good in place.
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >> On Jun 28, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>> Hi Rob,
> >>>
> >>> I tested with some commercial addresses I will need to locate
> >>> (here in France) :  results are not good enough... Morevover the
> >>> company I will do that for is already using (lat., long.). So I
> >>> will really need them. So my question to the community remains :
> >>> PostalAddress or extend-entity ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks Rob,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is an interesting information, I'm just discovering Google
> >>>> Map API and related...
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "Rob Schapper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Jacques,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to use the google geocode methods to
> >>>>> get  the lat/long from an address rather then store that info in
> >>>>> ofbiz?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rob
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Chris,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It was a long time :o), thanks for comments
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I need them to use with Google Map. To do something like
> >>>>>> http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/examples/marker-simpl
> >>>>>>e.html you can see there map.setCenter(new GLatLng(37.4419,
> >>>>>> -122.1419), 13);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hopefully I will be able to do something general enough to be
> >>>>>> reusable (should not be too hard, the tough part is already
> >>>>>> done by
> >>>>>> Google)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jacques
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> From: "Chris Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I wasn't going to comment on this because I don't think I have
> >>>>>>> the  time available to see the discussion through to the end,
> >>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>> after reading David's "Data Model Changes Post", I'll toss my
> >>>>>>> two  cents about this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What are you wanting to ultimately do with Lat/Long?  From my
> >>>>>>> experience with GeoServer earlier this year, storing Lat/Long
> >>>>>>> values
> >>>>>>> is rather inconvenient when doing computations and placing
> >>>>>>> points  (and polygons) on Maps.  It was much more convenient
> >>>>>>> to store
> >>>>>>> these points in the manner prescribed by postgis and using
> >>>>>>> the  methods that are provided in those kinds of packages.
> >>>>>>> Also, as far
> >>>>>>> as data modeling, it's somewhat innacurate (although depending
> >>>>>>> on  your application, possibly within acceptable bounds) to
> >>>>>>> refer to
> >>>>>>> an address as a point that has the specificity you'd be
> >>>>>>> assigning.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will need to add Latitude and Longitude fields in
> >>>>>>> PostalAdress.  Could this be a change commited ?
> >>>>>>> I will also need to add a type PHONE_HOTLINE in
> >>>>>>> ContactMechPurposeType.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Else, of course I will use
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jacques

Reply via email to