--- On Fri, 5/1/09, Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > This is one of the big reasons what I love and hate > community driven software. I don't see how what Andrew > did is bad. Even though it was personal communication but I > know Andrew only started after Adrian and Jacques showed > interest by commenting on the page.
The only interest I showed was that I agreed that OFBiz security could use improvement, and I suggested he use a third party library. I did not endorse or approve of his design. > Andrew has been actively explaining his idea all this time. As I demonstrated in another reply, no he did not. Only a few days went by between introducing the idea and committing code. > The work done till date is not blocking anybody, old > security system is still in place. New system is implemented > in example component so its lot easy for him to explain and > people to understand. What if the new work is a bad design? How will we know that until everyone has had time to evaluate it? > People have different ways of working in community, Joe is > committer still all the time he creates Jira issue and > uploads his patch and most of time its somebody else who > does commits, but that's his way of working. If we > don't do what Joe does then why should Andrew do what > Adrian does. As far as I know, Joe submits patches for things he doesn't have commit rights to. > I don't see any reason why we should start over. Do you see a reason why we shouldn't? Will the project suffer immensely if we pause and wait for others to comment? Is there some catastrophe looming that requires us to rush this through? > All > the time we talk about making things easy so people will > contribute, Why do you want to resist a seasoned contributer > for working. I'll rather have expect community will > support. All the time he has been asking people to tell him > suggestions, wish list etc. Why not support him and get more > out of him instead. If we can't invite the community to participate - as I suggested - then that only proves what I suspect - that this is a design that is being foisted on the community. -Adrian