Hi Scott, If that was offending to you i apologize for that. I was under the impression that the Eclipse license was allowed and you, you stated it yourself, brought up license issues without being a license expert and gave me the burden to solve it also being far from a license expert.
For every new function I introduce there is a lot of opposition always by the same people which sometimes gives me the feeling that simply reasons are found to block my contributions. Perhaps the main problem here is that i put business reasons much higher than technical reasons and most people here are technical. All seems now be solved, and i appreciate you technical view and comments on the system. Concerning my comment about relationships, had nothing to do with you, just by the way way people in general treat each other here in the mailing list, which is much different here in Thailand and has its disadvantages too. Probably nothing is perfect in this world. Regards, Hans On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 21:46 +1300, Scott Gray wrote: > On 8/12/2009, at 4:34 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > > > Thank you Scott for the statement. > > > > For the record, all work on the Birt branch was done by Chattree, a > > colleague of mine here at Antwebsystems. I just helped him a bit > > because > > the tough western (mailinglist) mentality is not really compatible > > with > > the Asian culture where relationships are the most important value. > > If you're implying that I've treated our relationship with less value > than was appropriate then I take offense to that. I'd like to remind > you that I spent some of my spare time reviewing your work instead of > working on things that I am interested in and you proceeded to ignore > my review even though you requested it. When you finally did > acknowledge my comments you treated them as some sort of unfair burden > that I was placing on you. I found your actions to be rude, very > annoying and hardly indicative of your desire to have a good working > relationship. So for you to sit here and attempt to take the high > ground when you have been the agitator during these discussions is a > little bit rich for my liking. > > Regards > Scott > > > > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > > On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 08:25 +1300, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Hi Ruppert > >> > >> Hans ended up removing the code which was of concern so the issues > >> that I suggested he discuss with legal are no longer present. > >> > >> Regards > >> Scott > >> > >> On 8/12/2009, at 4:49 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> > >>> Did all of this go to legal like was requested? If not, then it's a > >>> -1 to commit this to the trunk. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ruppert > >>> -- > >>> Tim Ruppert > >>> HotWax Media > >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > >>> > >>> o:801.649.6594 > >>> f:801.649.6595 > >>> > >>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Scott, > >>>> > >>>> had some time to look at it this weekend? > >>>> > >>>> if not more objections i plan to commit the birt branch to the > >>>> trunk > >>>> this week. Thank you for your time spend on this subject. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Hans > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 01:18 +1300, Scott Gray wrote: > >>>> ..... > >>>>>> Did you look at the New Revision: 886087 where we solved your > >>>>>> last > >>>>>> concerns? > >>>>> > >>>>> Briefly and I liked the approach, I'll take another pass over the > >>>>> whole thing on the weekend. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>>> > >>> > >> > > -- > > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
