Tim Ruppert wrote: > How can introducing another EBay implementation because a fellow committer is > just too far down that road really ok for the rest of the project? Try > explaining it to anyone trying to use the system why this was done - > unfortunately we can't (don't know the original gap or what was solved by > this new system) so we have basically forked the Ebay component because > someone didn't want to do the proper analysis about even what they're getting > with this new system. > > It's just unfortunate. Fellow committer - again thanks for trying to push > things forward - you do that that after and we all appreciate it, but if you > weren't in such a hurry sometimes, we'd have more substantive conversation > that would lead to a better software product for you, your customers and the > rest of the community. Instead, we've not only got a new Ebay component, but > everyone also gets additional analysis to on top of trying to figure out Ebay.
Fellow committer seems a bit condescending to me. Not trying to pick a fight here(which others seem to think is all I enjoy doing), just trying to help you word your responses better. If I'm wrong, then go ahead and ignore me.
