Too late - at least then we can discuss it without the other baggage in the thread. Anyways, the message is across so hopefully we can have that laid out so we can let the feature comparison begin! Looking forward to getting this resolved ASAP.
Cheers, Ruppert On Feb 5, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > I don't think it is necessary to resend it, the content of the message was > clear enough regardless of the form you used. > > Jacopo
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
