I have mixed feelings. IMO we should use prototype (prototype based UI components), and not use Dojo.
If we are really not happy with UI plugins in prototype then I'll personally prefer JQuery over Dojo for sure. Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Jun 1, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Forwarded again :( > > This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks > > Jacques > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" > <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM > Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4 > > >> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links... >> >> Jacques >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" >> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >> To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM >> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4 >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly >>> helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things to improve in the >>> UI. >>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link >>> http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5 >>> >>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an >>> older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new stuff like different >>> icons on each node, drag&drop, etc. >>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I >>> searched only in title) >>> >>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit >>> differently than previous one for trees. So the code related to the OFBiz >>> link above needs a bit of revamping. >>> >>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo tree, >>> because I know some don't like to have many js libs in OFBiz. So if you >>> feel we should do otherwise please speak... >>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't >>> collide. >>> >>> Jacques >>> > >
