Looks like good plan. Overtime people might choose to replace prototype framework with similar thing from Dojo.
Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > So far I have mostly used Dojo for its tree in a CMS tool, and some Prototype > functions notably for layered lookups. > I still see them as complementary (Dojo coming more complete but heavier, > Prototype being mostly an API). > I does do think it's necessary to make a choice. > > Jacques > > From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@yahoo.com> >> >From what I recall, the two libraries were included in the project with the >> >idea that the most popular one would get used. At the >> >time, Dojo was a very heavy library and the first attempts to use it >> >resulted in very slow page loads. I used Prototype in some >> >initial Ajax work - mainly because it was pretty easy to use. Today, I have >> >no preference for either one. >> >> -Adrian >> >> --- On Sat, 6/5/10, Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: >> >>> From: Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>> Subject: Re: Dojo tree 1.4 >>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org >>> Cc: "Anil Patel" <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> >>> Date: Saturday, June 5, 2010, 7:00 AM >>> I started using Dojo in Ofbiz long >>> back and in six months because of issues faced we switched >>> to using prototype. At that time there were few others in >>> comunity who liked prototype better. But I really don't >>> remember the reasons. >>> >>> Since then new checkout process was added that uses >>> prototype for all javascript needs. But did not remove Dojo >>> because i did not want to upset anybody in community. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards >>> Anil Patel >>> HotWax Media Inc >>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword >>> "ofbiz" >>> >>> On Jun 5, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> > I have created a branch >>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/dojo1.4 >>> > Nothing else for now >>> > >>> > Jacques >>> > >>> > From: "Sascha Rodekamp" <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com> >>> >> Hi Jacques ... >>> >> jep it's a lot of work but not impossible :) >>> >> A brunch is a good idea to start working on this >>> project. I think the reason >>> >> for Antil was, that he isn't use to Dojo. But that >>> shouldn't be a problem >>> >> the syntax isn't complicated. >>> >> And by the way, if this will work the new Dojo >>> will bring us a big benefit >>> >> (in my opinion). >>> >> Cheers >>> >> Sascha >>> >> 2010/6/5 Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >>> >>> Sascha, >>> >>> >>> >>> We should rather use the dev ML for this >>> thread. >>> >>> >>> >>> Maybe it's the reason why Anil was reluctant >>> to use Dojo? >>> >>> >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Sascha Rodekamp wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Hey, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> so i started upgrading to dojo 1.4. >>> >>>>> The good point is ... Dojo 1.4 has >>> many really cool new Features which >>> >>>>> can >>> >>>>> help us to improve the UI. >>> >>>>> The Bad thing is, some parts of the >>> syntax had changed. That effects many >>> >>>>> parts in OFBiz (OnePageCheckout, >>> Trees, all Dojo features Scripts :-)). >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Arg, I did not thought it will be so much >>> trouble :/ >>> >>>> >>> >>>> So that's a lot of work and i can't do it >>> on my own ... who volunteer to >>> >>>>> help me ;) ?? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I could help >>> >>>> >>> >>>> First Step is to collect all depending >>> issues and than to fix them step >>> >>>>> by >>> >>>>> step. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> So if we do that we need a branch I >>> guess... >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Jacques >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Have a nice day >>> >>>>> Sascha >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> http://www.lynx.de >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
