I'd have to agree, I still feel pretty strongly that we should only have one javascript library in OFBiz.
I've used this tree before on top of prototype: http://weblog.axent.pl/examples/js.drag-drop-tree/ I'm not sure how it compares feature-wise to the dojo tree but I found it met my needs just fine and didn't require any strange html layouts or non-compliant xhtml attributes like dojo does. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 2/06/2010, at 12:42 PM, Anil Patel wrote: > I have mixed feelings. IMO we should use prototype (prototype based UI > components), and not use Dojo. > > If we are really not happy with UI plugins in prototype then I'll personally > prefer JQuery over Dojo for sure. > > Thanks and Regards > Anil Patel > HotWax Media Inc > Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" > > On Jun 1, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >> Forwarded again :( >> >> This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks >> >> Jacques >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" >> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >> To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM >> Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4 >> >> >>> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links... >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" >>> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> >>> To: <dev@ofbiz.apache.org> >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM >>> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4 >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly >>>> helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things to improve in >>>> the UI. >>>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link >>>> http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5 >>>> >>>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an >>>> older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new stuff like different >>>> icons on each node, drag&drop, etc. >>>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I >>>> searched only in title) >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit >>>> differently than previous one for trees. So the code related to the OFBiz >>>> link above needs a bit of revamping. >>>> >>>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo >>>> tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs in OFBiz. So if >>>> you feel we should do otherwise please speak... >>>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't >>>> collide. >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >> >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
