Sorry, my last response sounded a bit arrogant after I re-read it.  My 
apologies to anyone who might actually be doing this.  I just personally feel 
like that is not a good idea.  Way too many unknown variables on a day to day 
basis.
 
Ryan L. Foster
801.671.0769
cont...@ryanlfoster.com

On Jan 6, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Ryan Foster wrote:

> Agreed.  I don't know anyone that updates a production server directly from a 
> development trunk, especially not a community driven open-source development 
> trunk.
> 
> Ryan L. Foster
> 801.671.0769
> cont...@ryanlfoster.com
> 
> On Jan 6, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> 
>> The theme will still be present in the 10.04 releases.
>> No production servers should rely on trunk.
>> 
>> -Bruno
>> 
>> 2011/1/6 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net>
>> 
>>> I have one that uses the flat grey as default
>>> so if I do an update from the svn the flat grey will and my customization
>>> disappear.
>>> 
>>> my sas uses all those in the themes, with my modification.
>>> they will be removed. when the svn update is run.
>>> 
>>> those are just a few examples.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> =========================
>>> BJ Freeman
>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation  <
>>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52>
>>> Specialtymarket.com  <http://www.specialtymarket.com/>
>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist
>>> 
>>> Chat  Y! messenger: bjfr33man
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bruno Busco sent the following on 1/6/2011 2:00 PM:
>>> 
>>> I am sorry, BJ, I do not see your point.
>>>> 
>>>> What could be the issue?
>>>> We will have less themes to maintain in the trunk (just Flat Grey,
>>>> Tomahawk,
>>>> Default and Multiflex).
>>>> We will have more people that will be able to maintain additional themes
>>>> in
>>>> the Themes Gallery.
>>>> 
>>>> Production servers will have each one its selected theme (one of the OOTB,
>>>> one of the Themes Gallery or a customized version of them).
>>>> 
>>>> -Bruno
>>>> 
>>>> 2011/1/6 BJ Freeman<bjf...@free-man.net>
>>>> 
>>>> how about those that are using ofbiz for SAS and will have many themes
>>>>> for
>>>>> their clients.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bruno Busco sent the following on 1/6/2011 12:51 PM:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, having more than one theme in the trunk was originally accepted in
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> order to use and show the visual theme selection feature OOTB.
>>>>>> Actually Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs and Tomahawk are one the evolution
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the other.
>>>>>> Each time we decided to create a new theme instead of replacing the one
>>>>>> existing just to avoid problems to users.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My proposal is to remove Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs and BizznessTime
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> the trunk and put them in a separate themes repository as suggested by
>>>>>> Ryan.
>>>>>> Remove the actual version of the Flat Grey from the trunk and put it in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> themes repository.
>>>>>> Improve the Flat Grey theme in the trunk with the work you guys are
>>>>>> doing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In this way we will have in the trunk two themes for the backend (Actual
>>>>>> FlatGrey and Tomahawk) and two themes for the ecommerce (Default and
>>>>>> Multiflex).
>>>>>> In the themes repository there will be Bluelight, Dropping Crumbs,
>>>>>> BizznessTime and the actual FlatGrey.
>>>>>> It could be a nice start for the theme repository (and gallery) start.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Bruno
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2011/1/6 Jacques Le Roux<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> inline...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>>> 801.671.0769
>>>>>>>> cont...@ryanlfoster.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Jacques,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I understand your concerns about support, and your thoughts on the
>>>>>>>>>> themes has some valid points.  However, in regards to the
>>>>>>>>>> BizznessTime theme, I never really intended for that to be "my"
>>>>>>>>>> theme
>>>>>>>>>> anyway.  I always viewed it as a community theme as that
>>>>>>>>>> was it's original intent and it was truly a collaborative effort to
>>>>>>>>>> build it between myself, my colleagues at HotWax, BrainFood,
>>>>>>>>>> and other members of the the OFBiz community.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Right, sorry for that Ryan. It's only because I know you were one
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> "fathers" (the most important I guess) and helped much
>>>>>>>>> at the beginning, my apologies.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> At any rate, my time issues and focus have shifted significantly
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> the last few months as I have left HotWax and gone into
>>>>>>>>>> independent consulting and freelance development.  I plan on taking
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> much more active role in the community in the months and
>>>>>>>>>> years ahead.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> That's really a good, very good news!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> As far as theme contributions go, I wonder if maybe it would be a
>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> idea to have a theme repo outside of the trunk that
>>>>>>>>>> individuals could commit to?  The problem with theme maintenance
>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> new theme has been added to the trunk is that not
>>>>>>>>>> everyone has commit privileges to the trunk.  This makes the process
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> maintenance a lot more time consuming for individual
>>>>>>>>>> contributors as they have to rely on patches, updates,
>>>>>>>>>> collaboration,
>>>>>>>>>> etc, rather than just monitoring and maintaining their own
>>>>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This could certainly be discussed as themes are no blocking parts
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>>> as *at least one works "perfectly"* (another way is to
>>>>>>>>> become committer), opinions?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I think the way that Magento and Wordpress do it are good examples.
>>>>>>>> With
>>>>>>>> Wordpress, there is one "official" theme that is
>>>>>>>> included with the install, but there are literally thousands of themes
>>>>>>>> that are not maintained by Wordpress that they list on
>>>>>>>> there site http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/, and now with the 3.0
>>>>>>>> release you can even search for new themes and install them
>>>>>>>> automatically from inside your Wordpress install.  Doing it this way
>>>>>>>> fosters wider community support by delegating maintenance of
>>>>>>>> these themes to individual contributors rather than forcing it on a
>>>>>>>> handful of committers and also allows developers to monetize
>>>>>>>> there contributions by offering "premium" themes and plugins.  In
>>>>>>>> fact,
>>>>>>>> there are many individuals and companies in the Wordpress
>>>>>>>> community that make their living solely by selling themes and plugins.
>>>>>>>> This furthers solidifies the base of support for the
>>>>>>>> project by offering a mid-tier option for someone who wants something
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> than OOTB but can't necessarily afford custom
>>>>>>>> development.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This makes good sense indeed. The only difference, I guess, is
>>>>>>> unfortunately the width of the audience. This does not mean that we
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>> not try...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 801.671.0769
>>>>>>>>>> cont...@ryanlfoster.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> From my perspective, I don't see much chance in the Flat Grey
>>>>>>>>>> visual
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> theme being abandoned. Enough people use it that it will
>>>>>>>>>>> get the attention it needs. If Ryan isn't available to fix
>>>>>>>>>>> something,
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> can fix it. If I'm not available, someone else could
>>>>>>>>>>> fix it, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/6/2011 6:02 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your screen copies at
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4092
>>>>>>>>>>>> looks really great! Looking forward for the implementation...
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> My concerns are that maybe you will not have enough time later to
>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>> up with possible bugs or other issues. Look for instance what
>>>>>>>>>>>> happened
>>>>>>>>>>>> to Bizzness Time https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2398
>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if it looks a bit old, we have a theme which works great. Why
>>>>>>>>>>>> taking any risks with it? Also I can't see any issues with having
>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>> themes. The more we have the better, I like to have the choice.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Some
>>>>>>>>>>>> (rare) people prefer to use old things, see games machines or
>>>>>>>>>>>> synthesizers for instance (I still love the DX-7 sound
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_DX7
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.vintagesynth.com/yamaha/dx7.php)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> There are any evolved version of Flat Grey yet. So this could be
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1st
>>>>>>>>>>>> modern one still using the RTL mechanism introduced by Adrian.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>>> choice the name!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan Foster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO I see no reason to have a "Flat Grey Evolution" theme. Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> right, the Flat Grey theme hasn't had a visual update in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> years and it looks very dated. It needs some love. Let's not add
>>>>>>>>>>>>> another improved version, let's just improve the version we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have now. I think that is more efficient and more beneficial in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> long run.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As far as the tabs go, we can still keep a horizontal, tab-like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> navigation without actually having the tabs look like tabs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because, the absolutely do look terrible displayed in two rows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Adrian, I would be happy to collaborate with you on this. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think I have some ideas that could help. Email me directly if you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hash out some ideas outside of this mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Consequently, as far as new admin themes go, I guess I can use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an opportunity as well to drop a teaser about a new theme
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been working on already for some time now that I honestly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will become the go-to theme for scalability and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> customization, and that will eventually replace the Flat Grey
>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme
>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether. The new theme scales down very well to 800x600
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and has minimal styling for maximum flexibility and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> customization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned for more details in the next few days...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ryan L. Foster
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 801.671.0769
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cont...@ryanlfoster.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chiclet refers to a brand of chewing gum. The tabs look like
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pieces
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Chiclets chewing gum. They look terrible when they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> displayed in two rows.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- On Mon, 1/3/11, Jacques Le Roux<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By "chiclet" main navigation style,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you mean the tabs? Then I think we should keep Flat Grey as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is (because there are advantages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to have tabs) and create a Flat Grey evolution...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adrian Crum"<adrian.c...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was thinking we could use colors from the Apache logo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the BizznessTime theme. I would also like to get rid of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "chiclet"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main navigation style, and maybe have that menu in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> collapsible left column.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Sascha Rodekamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Sascha Rodekamp<sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Discussion: Flat Grey Visual Theme
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Jacques Le Roux"<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 2:27 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I really would appreciate to keep the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flat Gray. But you're right it needs a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> few visual improvements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me think about this, maybe somethink comes to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my mind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..... :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2010/12/29 Jacques Le Roux<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRW, it's the only really RTL capable. So a big YES to keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no ideas though :/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adrian Crum"<adrian.c...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Flat Grey visual theme is getting old.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current version of the theme is based on the original
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and feel of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz when I first joined the community - back in 2004.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Spring of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2007 I added some gradient gifs to make the original style
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interesting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After that, the visual theme was converted to a floating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flexible layout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (to fit any size screen), it was made
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight-impaired accessible (font size
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be changed), and it added support for bi-directional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> layout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (for rtl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> languages). Those design decisions were made by the OFBiz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> community and, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my opinion, continue to make the Flat Grey theme the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fallback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> theme when all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> else fails. It just works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Despite its advantages, it looks dated. I would like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it more modern, but maintain its advantages over the other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> themes. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thinking it only needs css and gif file updates. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> templates and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> javascripts would be maintained.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anyone is interested, they are welcome to help out. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any suggestions or comments.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know what you think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Adrian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sascha Rodekamp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Johanniskirchplatz 6
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D-33615 Bielefeld
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.lynx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to