+1 On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 18:48 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > What do we gain by adding the complications of more progressive enhancement > to the OFBiz UI? Are there some "must have" features that we're missing out > on? I'm not asking because I'm against it, I'm asking because I don't know. > > I will be against it if we add complications for only minor gains though, or > if the additional support is implemented in a haphazard manner. > > Regards > Scott > > On 28/05/2011, at 12:43 AM, Patrick Antivackis wrote: > > > Hello, > > I would like to have ofbiz ready for HTML5 and it is not really out of > > the box ready for that (for exemple doctype is hard coded in java and > > ftl macros). > > There are lot of things to update in order to have a real html5 ofbiz > > (doctype, container, microdata/microformat, ftl tags, style, ...) so > > it would need a master jira task if such thing as to be done and still > > be managed by configuration (in order to have xhtml1.0-transitional as > > well as html5 web apps or even view). > > > > Is this something interesting for the community for which i can create > > a jira ticket with sub ticket corresponding for each task I already > > identified ? > > > > Regards > > > > Patrick >
-- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
