Hey Patrick, jap that's a good plan. +1 from me. Thanks for clarification. I like the idea making ofbiz future ready and not to migrate everything. And yes HTML5 is really helpful for providing mobile apps.
Have a good day. Sascha 2011/5/28 Patrick Antivackis <patrick.antivac...@gmail.com> > For me there are several things : > - today we are sticked to xhtml-1.0-transitional as the doctype is > hardcoded in javaRenderer and macro ftl. Doctype has a real meaning > for browser as it triggers compatibility rendering engine. So even if > we can use some htlm5 tags, we are generating a bad doctype > - my idea is not to rewrite all existing applications in html5, they > can stick to xhtml-1.0-transitional, it's just to allow new projects > to be able to write html5 webapp using our classical ofbiz tools > (widget, screen, ...) > - html5 brings lot of improvement in semantic for both robots (new > tags, microformat, microdata) as well as for the browser (form > semantic to allow mobile device to show the right input pad for > example) > - html5 is the universal solution to reach mobile (phones and tablets) > and the future of ecommerce will be also mcommerce > > I don't specially want to implement hype stuff such as canvas, webgl, > websocket, webworker, drag and drop ... , as they are too on the edge > side and bring too much compatibility issues. > > That's also why i created a master task, showing the global aim, and > each subtask can be subject to approval. > > Patrick > > > > > > 2011/5/28 Sascha Rodekamp <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com>: > > Hi *, > > > > can we find a few arguments why we should use HTML5. I think of Browser > > compatibility (IE 7 / 8, FF 3 ...). Would you suggest to implement i.e. > > Drag'n'Drop (used in the Portal Area) in HTML5 for modern Browser and in > JS > > to make it available in old once? > > > > I'm only be a little bit afraid of Browser backward compatibility :) > > > > Cheers > > Sascha > > > > 2011/5/28 Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> > > > >> +1 > >> > >> On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 18:48 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > >> > What do we gain by adding the complications of more progressive > >> enhancement to the OFBiz UI? Are there some "must have" features that > we're > >> missing out on? I'm not asking because I'm against it, I'm asking > because I > >> don't know. > >> > > >> > I will be against it if we add complications for only minor gains > though, > >> or if the additional support is implemented in a haphazard manner. > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > Scott > >> > > >> > On 28/05/2011, at 12:43 AM, Patrick Antivackis wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hello, > >> > > I would like to have ofbiz ready for HTML5 and it is not really out > of > >> > > the box ready for that (for exemple doctype is hard coded in java > and > >> > > ftl macros). > >> > > There are lot of things to update in order to have a real html5 > ofbiz > >> > > (doctype, container, microdata/microformat, ftl tags, style, ...) so > >> > > it would need a master jira task if such thing as to be done and > still > >> > > be managed by configuration (in order to have xhtml1.0-transitional > as > >> > > well as html5 web apps or even view). > >> > > > >> > > Is this something interesting for the community for which i can > create > >> > > a jira ticket with sub ticket corresponding for each task I already > >> > > identified ? > >> > > > >> > > Regards > >> > > > >> > > Patrick > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Sascha Rodekamp > > Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz > > Lynx-Consulting GmbH > > Johanniskirchplatz 6 > > D-33615 Bielefeld > > http://www.lynx.de > > > -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de
