Sasha, Thank for your feedback, i update the title of the main task, because the word "compliant" could indeed be ambiguous, i changed it to ready
2011/5/28 Sascha Rodekamp <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com>: > Hey Patrick, > > jap that's a good plan. +1 from me. > Thanks for clarification. > I like the idea making ofbiz future ready and not to migrate everything. > And yes HTML5 is really helpful for providing mobile apps. > > Have a good day. > Sascha > > > 2011/5/28 Patrick Antivackis <patrick.antivac...@gmail.com> > >> For me there are several things : >> - today we are sticked to xhtml-1.0-transitional as the doctype is >> hardcoded in javaRenderer and macro ftl. Doctype has a real meaning >> for browser as it triggers compatibility rendering engine. So even if >> we can use some htlm5 tags, we are generating a bad doctype >> - my idea is not to rewrite all existing applications in html5, they >> can stick to xhtml-1.0-transitional, it's just to allow new projects >> to be able to write html5 webapp using our classical ofbiz tools >> (widget, screen, ...) >> - html5 brings lot of improvement in semantic for both robots (new >> tags, microformat, microdata) as well as for the browser (form >> semantic to allow mobile device to show the right input pad for >> example) >> - html5 is the universal solution to reach mobile (phones and tablets) >> and the future of ecommerce will be also mcommerce >> >> I don't specially want to implement hype stuff such as canvas, webgl, >> websocket, webworker, drag and drop ... , as they are too on the edge >> side and bring too much compatibility issues. >> >> That's also why i created a master task, showing the global aim, and >> each subtask can be subject to approval. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/5/28 Sascha Rodekamp <sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com>: >> > Hi *, >> > >> > can we find a few arguments why we should use HTML5. I think of Browser >> > compatibility (IE 7 / 8, FF 3 ...). Would you suggest to implement i.e. >> > Drag'n'Drop (used in the Portal Area) in HTML5 for modern Browser and in >> JS >> > to make it available in old once? >> > >> > I'm only be a little bit afraid of Browser backward compatibility :) >> > >> > Cheers >> > Sascha >> > >> > 2011/5/28 Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> >> > >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 18:48 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: >> >> > What do we gain by adding the complications of more progressive >> >> enhancement to the OFBiz UI? Are there some "must have" features that >> we're >> >> missing out on? I'm not asking because I'm against it, I'm asking >> because I >> >> don't know. >> >> > >> >> > I will be against it if we add complications for only minor gains >> though, >> >> or if the additional support is implemented in a haphazard manner. >> >> > >> >> > Regards >> >> > Scott >> >> > >> >> > On 28/05/2011, at 12:43 AM, Patrick Antivackis wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > Hello, >> >> > > I would like to have ofbiz ready for HTML5 and it is not really out >> of >> >> > > the box ready for that (for exemple doctype is hard coded in java >> and >> >> > > ftl macros). >> >> > > There are lot of things to update in order to have a real html5 >> ofbiz >> >> > > (doctype, container, microdata/microformat, ftl tags, style, ...) so >> >> > > it would need a master jira task if such thing as to be done and >> still >> >> > > be managed by configuration (in order to have xhtml1.0-transitional >> as >> >> > > well as html5 web apps or even view). >> >> > > >> >> > > Is this something interesting for the community for which i can >> create >> >> > > a jira ticket with sub ticket corresponding for each task I already >> >> > > identified ? >> >> > > >> >> > > Regards >> >> > > >> >> > > Patrick >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz >> >> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak >> >> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Sascha Rodekamp >> > Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz >> > Lynx-Consulting GmbH >> > Johanniskirchplatz 6 >> > D-33615 Bielefeld >> > http://www.lynx.de >> > >> > > > > -- > > Sascha Rodekamp > Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz > Lynx-Consulting GmbH > Johanniskirchplatz 6 > D-33615 Bielefeld > http://www.lynx.de >
