On Jan 6, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, January 06, 2014 10:03 AM, [email protected] wrote >> Then, here is my personal wish list: >> >> * integrate Atomikos Transaction Manager (to replace the existing old and >> incomplete Geronimo Transaction Manager); I did most >> of the work some time ago and also Scott helped me; but the effort is not >> completed (but we are close); this is on hold at the >> moment and it would be great to give it a final push > > Just as a note: it seems David experienced some issue with Atomikos in Moqui > OOTB http://tinyurl.com/pwefeoo > And you have sometimes to use workaround config (Postgres needs it for > instance, reported David) Related to this I've been testing more with Bitronix BTM recently and it seems to be doing much better than Atomikos in various scenarios. Part of my frustration with Atomikos is the lack of bug fixes going into open source releases. They put them in the subscriber-only releases for a few months to over a year before putting them in the open source releases, meaning the lag time for bug fixes and support for open source users (including open source projects that may be used commercially) is significant. -David
