Sorry, I mean I second Adrian's explanation which is obviously not to vote for
moving to Git
And If you read the thread you will see I already said: " a -1 if necessary!"
Jacques
Le 20/04/2015 13:05, Pierre Smits a écrit :
@Jacques: is your +1 to be regarded as a yes vote fore moving to git? I am
getting confused somehow.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
+1, well summarised Adrian!
Jacques
Le 20/04/2015 12:39, Adrian Crum a écrit :
That's the point I was trying to make. Our needs in this project are
pretty basic, and Subversion handles those needs well. Git will merely make
things unnecessarily complicated.
At ApacheCon, the motivations for switching to Git were not related to
OFBiz project management, but were related to local management of
OFBiz-based projects. The common complaint was connecting local Git
repositories to the project's Subversion repository. So, switching the
project to Git will make life easier for some.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 4/20/2015 11:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
I am also familiar with Git.
Please don't project your uncertainties regarding the expertise and
experiences of other as their traits. And don't confuse advancement with
suitability. A rocket ship is more advanced than a bike. But that doesn't
mean it is suitable for more than just hauling stuff into space.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Adrian Crum <
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com> wrote:
I am thoroughly familiar with Git. I've used it on on three projects,
and
that is why I don't like it.
I have a far easier time merging branches with Subversion. Git always
screws things up.
I don't need to be convinced of anything. I have my experience and my
opinion. But still, I'm not opposed to switching to Git.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 4/20/2015 11:08 AM, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
One of the most difficult and challenging issue with branches is
_merging_
them. Git is a tool that is far more advanced in its feature set in
that
area.
It seems some of the opinions expressed against git are due to
unfamiliarity. The only way to be convinced is to try it on an advanced
level as i don't think an email thread would be enough for convincing
anyone of the merits.
My 2 cents
Taher Alkhateeb
On Apr 20, 2015 12:54 PM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
If we only want GIT for multiple local development branches, then we
are
doing for the wrong reasons. SVN doesn't hinder you in doing that
today.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Like Adrian and mostly for the same reasons, I don't believe we need
Git.
But there is one other major reason which has already been discussed
in
the other common ASF MLs. As Taher exulted, it's possible to create
local
branches. So people are able to do a lot of work alone without
exchanging
before committing or submitting. It will certainly not help to have
this
possibility. Remember our recent discussion on the lack or core
commits
reviews. With Git you end with commits bursts or big patches and it's
then
hard to review and too late to share ideas.
So unlike Adrian, I'm even strongly against it. I will not hesitate
to
use
a -1 if necessary!
Jacques
Le 20/04/2015 09:53, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I don't agree that "all major contributors are using git."
Personally, I find Git to be an overly complicated solution to a
simple
problem. It frequently does bizarre things that no one understands,
and
you
are left with things being mysteriously reverted for unknown reasons.
This isn't a -1 vote though. I'm just making it clear that I will be
dragged kicking and screaming into using it.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 4/20/2015 5:38 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
As discussed at apachecon in Austin, i propose to switch from svn
to
git
for the ofbiz repository. The main reason being that all major
contributors are using git and contributions are cumbersome,
further,
git allows for better branching and merging.
Regards,
Hans
