On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:30 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote:
> If people on both projects are the same not sure it makes so much > sense...and tomee code is really really small and doesnt do enough work to > let it be another project IMO (in fact it only does integration so fixes > are mainly in openejb) Exactly. It's a suggestion that sounds more appealing that it actually would be. TomEE and OpenEJB are basically the same thing -- there's very little actual code in "TomEE". People would quickly learn they don't have any control unless they had commit on the "OpenEJB" side. -David > Le 13 nov. 2012 23:45, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> What about having 2 TLPs? >> >> Actually OpenEJB is still very valuable as own standalone project. >> >> So I'd rather go for having TomEE AND OpenEJB as TLPs. >> >> It is already pretty much separated from the build structure. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: David Blevins <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 4:04 PM >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] TomEE as the TLP name >>> >>> Since it came up in the other thread, good time to officially raise the >>> discussion on how we want to identify ourselves as a TLP. >>> >>> There have been concerns raised on how we identify to the public in >> terms of our >>> primary identity -- "the website says TomEE in letters as big as my >>> hand" was one quote. This was many months ago and my feedback then was >>> we're still experimenting and we need time to figure ourselves out. >>> >>> It's been a year since TomEE has been released and officially certified. >>> The popularity is skyrocketing with no signs of slowing. As TomEE >> eclipses >>> OpenEJB it becomes more and more strange to call the TLP OpenEJB given >> our >>> website says TomEE all over it and that's all we present at conferences. >>> >>> What do people think about renaming this TLP from OpenEJB to TomEE? >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>
