On Tue, 20 May 2014 18:25:52 +0200 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/05/14 17:51, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:04:04 +0200 > > Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 20/05/14 00:59, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> > >>> On 05/17/2014 04:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>>> On 17/05/2014 Juergen Schmidt wrote: > >>>>> Anybody can propose things and we can discuss it. ... > >>>>> nobody should expect that others do the work. > >>>> > >>>> This is an excellent summary indeed. On one hand we can discuss and > >>>> collect ideas, but on the other hand these ideas need to be concretely > >>>> supported by developer resources to pass from the "brainstorming" phase > >>>> to the "planning" phase. > >>>> > >>>> At the level of brainstorming, for example, I believe that a priority > >>>> for a new major release would be a better integration with our online > >>>> resources (easier ways, built-in in the application, to reach our sites > >>>> for feedback, volunteering, support...). But if and how this can happen > >>>> will depend on the interest that current and new developers have in this. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Andrea. > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >>>> > >>> > >>> A new AOO 5.0 release page has been created on cwiki to collect ideas. > >>> But, I would think all discussion needs to be on "dev" and not the > >>> comments area on that page. > >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0 > >>> > >> > >> is it useful to create dummy pages when we don't have agreed on a > >> version number for the next release? I don't believe that the next > >> version will be a AOO 5.0 ;-) > >> > >> Juergen > > > > Planning for AOO 5.0 doesn't stop us working on a point release. Consider > > it as a longer term project. Some of the proposals might be too complex for > > incorporation into a point release. > > > > well don't get me wrong but on a planning page I would add only items > that are more concrete and and where a developer agreed to take of it. > General ideas should we better collect on some kind of backlog page. I > don't like to make long lists and drop half of them later on. But that > is my personal opinion. > > > Juergen I posted some suggestions to this list in the hope that they might spark someone's interest and cause him to brood on a possible implementation. They are suggestions merely, committing no one. -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
