Am 03.12.2017 um 11:11 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I would put Beta into the Splash screen, but Release I would use RC for
for Release Candidate plus a number. So the first version would be 4.2.0RC1
If this does not break something of course.
I think this wouldn't be suitable. As soon as we have the last RC which
get approved, it is automatically the final release build. But a RC in
names and graphics is not what we want.
And doing a new build without the RC stuff cannot be done as it is not
what we had voted for.
The max we could do is to use RC in the filenames. Then we need maybe
just a rename and we have the final build. In the worst case it's just a
new upload with the same binary files but then with correct filenames.
Marcus
On 03.12.2017 10:14, Marcus wrote:
Am 02.12.2017 um 23:21 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Dec 2, 2017, at 8:39 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de
<mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de>> wrote:
Am 02.12.2017 um 13:22 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Despite of the name it could be the icon of the dmg file? I don't
know where this icon set is visible... ;-)
Apart from that: +1 for a public beta.
But we should build "real" beta builds, with the appropriate
naming/graphics:
https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Beta/About%20OpenOffice%20Beta%204.2.0.png
oh yes, good hint. IMHO the splash screen and start center graphic
should show clearly that this is a beta release. Plus different
filenames for the installation files.
Here are the results on macOS:
that looks great. On the start center it's a bit different. "beta"
should be aligned with the productname/version like for the splash
screen.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
