Hi Jim, all
> I do have a question about the BUILD number... > > Say we release 4.1.5 and that build number is 9799. We then > release start doing betas and RCs for 4.2.0 and use 9800, > 9801 and 9802. We then find out we need to release a 4.1.6. > Is that BUILD number now 9803? > Wouldn't it be possible for the Build number to make some sense? It would be much easier if build number was related to the actual version? How about Build 41510 for 4.1.5 RC1, 41520 for RC2, etc? To make sure the build is greater than 9800 I added a 5th digit that could even be used for something else... This applies also to other version numbers in files https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126603 Just my 2 (non-dev) cents
