Am 18.10.20 um 04:13 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Top posting as well. I think we should consider our goals as a project. If one
of those goals is support for ODF as a theory of everything office that you can
trust and know will remain parsable a century from now then what does that mean
for OOXML?
The goals and current targets of the Project are imho:
# Maintenance
## Blocker List of 4.2.x
## Diverse Error reports (I want to advertise my Jira Collection of bugs
maybe?)
## SDK renewal
## Fix the '###' Write issue
## Fix the Profile Issue
### add a the support script for resetting the Profile by clicking
### Maybe having a Profile validator that wirtes reports would be also
something.
# Enablement for our users in features they request.
## OOXML is really requested a lot, imho always if people need to
collaborate with Microsoft Office users.
## Win64 bit is not really requested but something we need to continue
## Enhancement of our Applications (Michael whished for some
improvements in Base and Impress; others have reached out to talk about
Calc.)
# Enhance the Infrastructure / Code to lower maintenance costs.
## GSI Check is there to name. (Yea I should continue)
## SCONs transition
Now we can argue if an OOXML filter needs to be part of the Core
implementation. But have it developed as within a branch is not a big
deal. Lets see how it goes.
Maybe it attracts people who like to work on this topic? To make a
request visible is not bad.
All the Best
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
