Hi Mathias,

        So - I think your summary here is great:

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 14:41 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
... snip various good points...
> So perhaps we can describe it so (with less details ;-):
> 
> (1) While developing your feature: discuss feature with people on IRC,
> mailing lists and whatsoever to your liking; it is *recommended* (though
> not mandatory) to contact the project lead as early as possible and
> discuss with QA and UserEx also (not to ask for approval but to avoid
> problems by early contact!).
> 
> (2) While development happens make sure that at the end you deliver a
> "spec". This could be just an issue in IZ, a web page or a document,
> details can be described elsewhere. BTW: I consider having an Issue in
> IZ mandatory as we need to have a reference for cvs commits.
> 
> (3) Get necessary builds (perhaps by using build bots) and hand builds
> and "spec" over by announcing them somewhere(we must define where!) so
> that QA, translation and documentation can start working on it.
> 
> (4) React on feedback given by them, be it changing the "spec", fixing a
> bug etc.

        One thing - we managed to loose the timeouts here :-) since
non-responsiveness has been a bug-bear for some years, and is one of
those things that may vary substantially over time depending on mgmt
imperatives & focus, I really want those in there.

        In order to have a 'fair' timeout, it's necessary to have a
time-stamped, reliable, agreed communication medium and length of
timeout: a mailing list is fine for that I guess; but it should be
specified. Possible an early 'features@' post is sufficient (?).

        On the other hand - the real strength of your outline is that it is not
too rigid / specific: and can be iterated later and expanded as needed
to cover unforseen cases [ wow, have I converted you to an iterative
process development model ? ;-]

        So - where do we go from here ?

        I believe Kai volunteered to write some of this up in the Wiki
somewhere as a conclusion, so we actually move to the "decision making"
phase after the lengthy discussion ;-)

        Anyhow, thanks for your time,

        Regards,

                Michael.

-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to