Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi Mathias, > > On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 12:39 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote: >> Which timeouts are you talking about? > > Primarily interaction with User Experience, but also Documentation, > l10n - I'd like to ensure not only that they have a clearly defined > opportunity to comment / have their say; but that their window of > opportunity here is time limited :-) "'discuss' with ... UserEx" is > fundamentally synchronous, and very hard to verify later, and perhaps > open to lots of problems. Much as I hate process, I'd like to be able to > point to a mailing list post and say "no replies in 2 weeks" => > uncontroversial & approved.
I see. I think at least no developer (neither Sun or non-Sun) will have any problem to agree here. :-) The exact length of the timeout should be nailed by the ESC. 2 weeks seems to be enough IMHO. I hope that in cases where the person asked for a comment is helpful but isn't able to accomplish this in 2 weeks just because it is a lot of work to do nobody insists on a 2 week deadline. >> IMHO this could be a good reason for an ESC meeting. > > Indeed :-) it'd be good to talk; perhaps best to rubber-stamp (or > "recommend to the Community Council" (or whatever) the draft result ? Sounds good to me. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
