On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 15:39 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > Kohei Yoshida wrote (9-11-2007 15:21) > > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 08:54 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > >> Count for 2.3.0 is only (...) about 70. > >> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.3#Full_list > >> > >> Though some structured data/lists were available, it took more that a > >> day to only discover all features. Some simply had to be dug out > >> Issuetracker. > >> And one feature was discovered a month after the release of 2.3.0 :-) > > > > If only one feature is missing out of 70, it's not so bad IMO. That > > means we attain a 98% success rate. It's just a matter of whether the > > glass is half empty or half full. ;-) > > No, I picked up about 5 or 6, that were not on the regularly produced > lists. And not only small, obscure features. > Plus the one that came a month later, just discovered by chance. The > work on the list was finished by four weeks at that moment. Therefore > that one deserves a honourable mentioning, IMO :-)
Ah, OK. :-) > So, 98% is OK, but appr. 90% :-\ Still, 90% is still a good success rate, don't you think? :-) If that dropped to 70%, then I'd worry, but 90% sounds still success enough to me. But maybe I'm being too optimistic. Just to be clear, nothing gets me more excited than knowing that a feature I work to create is being marketed. So, I would be the last person to hide his own features. I even have by own blog for that. So, if you point me to your own compilation of new features, and I don't see my feature included there, I would even complain loudly "hey you forgot my feature". ;-) Kohei --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
