Hi,
+1 from me for your proposal.
Best regards,
Timo
Am 26.04.2013 07:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
Hi,
sorry for answering that late but my time is limited at present due to
an ongoing family event. :-)
There were more or less different opinions about the future layout of
our svn repo, but I guess there is a way everybody could agree to.
What do you think about the following proposal:
- use the current trunk for the ongoing development of 2.0.0
- use indivual branches for bigger changes in the trunk, as Guillaume
did when refactoring xmpbox
- use the current 1.8-branch [1] for bugfix-releases, as I did when
releasing 1.8.1
- a possible 1.9-branch could be created using the 1.8-branch if
necessary
Is this something everybody can agree to?
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/pdfbox/branches/1.8/
Am 18.04.13 21:11, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Hi,
what is our next target after releasing 1.8.0 and 1.8.1?
We already started some discussions about that topic, but I'd like to
have
clarification. Is it time to go for a 2.0 version? If we agree to that
goal,
how should we proceed? Should we branch or simply use the trunk?
I'd prefer to continue using the trunk. We are still able to release
bugfix versions using the 1.8-branch. Even a new 1.9 feature release
should be possible by branching the 1.8-branch.
WDYT?
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
--
Timo Boehme
OntoChem GmbH
H.-Damerow-Str. 4
06120 Halle/Saale
T: +49 345 4780474
F: +49 345 4780471
timo.boe...@ontochem.com
_____________________________________________________________________
OntoChem GmbH
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber
Sitz: Halle / Saale
Registergericht: Stendal
Registernummer: HRB 215461
_____________________________________________________________________
