dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Is STS Token Passthrough Supported in Polaris Federated Catalogs? [polaris] via GitHub
• [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Robert Stupp
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Robert Stupp
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Adam Christian
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Robert Stupp
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Accept OSI Semantic Model API Specification (PR #4816) Yufei Gu
• [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Yong Zheng
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision yun zou
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Yong Zheng
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision yun zou
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Yong Zheng
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSSION] Spark Plugin regtests from Docker based to JUnit based decision yun zou
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) EJ Wang
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
• [DISCUSS] Feature-specific SQL DDL files Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Feature-specific SQL DDL files Yufei Gu
• [DISCUSS] Single SQL DDL script Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Single SQL DDL script Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Single SQL DDL script Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Single SQL DDL script Ayush Saxena
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Single SQL DDL script Alexandre Dutra
• Please add me to the Polaris Slack, thanks! <EOM> Tarun Jangid
  • Re: Please add me to the Polaris Slack, thanks! <EOM> Yufei Gu
• JB's back :) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: JB's back :) Kevin Liu
  • Re: JB's back :) Danica Fine
  • Re: JB's back :) Keith Chapman
• [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Jackson 3 readiness for Polaris and Quarkus 4 Yufei Gu
• [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Anand Kumar Sankaran via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Modular design for new features Robert Stupp
• [DISCUSS] NoSQL backend missing entity cache - gap worth addressing? vignesh a
  • Re: [DISCUSS] NoSQL backend missing entity cache - gap worth addressing? Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] NoSQL backend missing entity cache - gap worth addressing? vignesh a
  • Re: [DISCUSS] NoSQL backend missing entity cache - gap worth addressing? Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [DISCUSS] OpenTelemetry event listener Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] OpenTelemetry event listener Adnan Hemani via dev
• [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) EJ Wang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) EJ Wang
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Polaris 1.6.0 (rc0) EJ Wang
• CI is broken on setup-gradle Yong Zheng
  • Re: CI is broken on setup-gradle Yufei Gu
  • Re: CI is broken on setup-gradle Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: CI is broken on setup-gradle Robert Stupp
  • Re: CI is broken on setup-gradle Yufei Gu
• [DISCUSS] Nullability in PolarisResolutionManifest -- broader cleanup? imavignesh27
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Nullability in PolarisResolutionManifest -- broader cleanup? Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Nullability in PolarisResolutionManifest -- broader cleanup? vignesh a
• [DISCUSS] Remove TestEnvironmentExtension Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Remove TestEnvironmentExtension Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adam Christian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses yun zou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Adam Christian
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Non-IRC endpoints in IRC config responses Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Multiple datasources with runtime activation Romain Manni-Bucau
• [DISCUSS] Behaviour of PURGE_VIEW_METADATA_ON_DROP Ayush Saxena
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Behaviour of PURGE_VIEW_METADATA_ON_DROP Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Tornike Gurgenidze
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Yufei Gu
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Adnan Hemani via dev
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Tornike Gurgenidze
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Yufei Gu
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] Scan Planning with Optional Caching Layers Prashant Singh
• [Discuss] Handler-level idempotency for createTable (#4659) huaxin gao
  • Re: [Discuss] Handler-level idempotency for createTable (#4659) Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [Discuss] Handler-level idempotency for createTable (#4659) Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [DISCUSS] Removing @Valid annotations from some generated API object builder methods Dmitri Bourlatchkov
• [DISCUSS] Removing PolarisMetricsManager from PolarisMetaStoreManager Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing PolarisMetricsManager from PolarisMetaStoreManager Yufei Gu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing PolarisMetricsManager from PolarisMetaStoreManager EJ Wang
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing PolarisMetricsManager from PolarisMetaStoreManager Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Removing PolarisMetricsManager from PolarisMetaStoreManager Jean-Baptiste Onofré
• [D] Fine grain Branch/Tag creation control [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Fine grain Branch/Tag creation control [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Fine grain Branch/Tag creation control [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Fine grain Branch/Tag creation control [polaris] via GitHub
• [DISCUSS] Why Polaris needs the server-test-runner Gradle plugin Robert Stupp
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Why Polaris needs the server-test-runner Gradle plugin Alexandre Dutra
• [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
  • Re: [D] Feasibility of 1 Realm per Tenant at 10,000 Tenants Scale? [polaris] via GitHub
• Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Prithvi S
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Prithvi S
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Prithvi S
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Prithvi S
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Prithvi S
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Dmitri Bourlatchkov
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Yufei Gu
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Alexandre Dutra
  • Re: Forwarding user-defined principal properties in PolarisPrincipal : PR #4405 Yufei Gu

• Earlier messages
• Later messages