Hi, > From: Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Double Mac OS X binaries > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:21:59 +0900 > > > As to Crashreports feature, told by Schnabel, and the past successful > > records of official builds, in the case of 3.0.0 rc1 of Mac OS X Intel, > > Sun build seems to be superior. Right? > Maho > > I don't know. As the QA project lead, I'm second to Andre and Joost. > "this is what the MacOSX porting team decide" and "each n-l leads decide" > > So ask Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about en-US build.
I asked Shaun McDonald about the current ja build. (Unfortunately, I'm not so interested in en-US version now.) I copied his reply below; Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Sun builds generally take > priority for the official builds that get distributed. > > It is useful having community builds too as it means that you can > test them if there is a bug in one and not the other. His answer didn't touch on the final decisoin, but just the priority. However, in fact, the final decision has been ever taken by each NL team, so I'd like to continue this question with Maho in the Japanese mailing list. I'm sorry for all the fuss. And I hope Maho keeps his long and meaningful build activities. I understand his achievement develops OOo comunity well, especially for PPC users and many users whose native language edition cannot be provided by SUN, and for reinforcing OOo's quality. Regads, -- Takashi Nakamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
