Rafael Schloming wrote:
Gordon Sim wrote:
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
After from feedback on the thread as well as from Rob and Rafi I have
whipped up another proposal which should be good enough for AMQP 1.0
as well.
The proposal is located at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Proposal+for+a+new+JMS+Destination+configuration2
Re the address format, I'd prefer a single char delimiter between type
and name[1]. It's not a huge issue one way or the other of course and
I can't think of any option that is clearer or more intuitive than any
other.
[1] E.g. <node-type>!<node-name>/<subject> instead of
<node-type>::<node-name>/<subject> (or replace ! with $, % etc)
This particular format is really just an interim thing I picked to have
something to play with. I don't particularly like the :: either, and I
think we also need to work the scheme in there somehow. I think a final
format would probably need to look more like this:
"amqp:" [ <node-type> "!" ] <node-name> [ "/" <subject> ]
I like that. Should we use 'qpid:' as the scheme, at least in the
interim? Just concerned that we don't co-opt the amqp name for something
that is not an official amqp standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
