Hi Piotr, I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop branch locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way first, especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the compiler.
I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI servers if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows (the CI server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename before the merge to develop. Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a clean machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders and environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the various READMEs first. Thanks, -Alex On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not sure >whether >I can push it to the rename - let me know. >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check whether >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you mean by >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it by maven >but not sure whether it is sufficient. > >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything looks ok. > >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all modules >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably it should >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. > >Thanks, Piotr > >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>: > >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to download >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should describe >>what >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order to have >>SWF >> output. >> >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary package" - It >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex project. I >>believe >> there could be more people like me. >> >> Thanks, Piotr >> >> >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>: >> >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post... >>> >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the nightly >>>for >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not SWF >>>output. >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) bundle >>>the >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF output. The >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe bits after >>> you download them. >>> >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the source zip >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos (royals-compiler, >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the JSOnly >>>binary >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" nightly but in >>>a >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash Builder and >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again require >>>running an >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. >>> >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially something you >>>choose >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure how, under >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of the >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the results of a >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create some sort >>>of >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. >>> >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven users you >>>choose >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe airglobal/playerglobal >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by default for the >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't have >>>them, >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. >>> >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night. >>> >>> HTH, >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>>Muppirala" >>> <omup...@gmail.com on behalf of bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package [1] and >>>have >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. >>> > >>> >[1] >>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% >>> 40adobe.co >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae >>> d2c178decee1%7C >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ >>> > >>> > >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the npm package >>> >right? >>> > >>> >Thanks, >>> >Om >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >Thanks, Piotr >>> > >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi Om, >>> >> >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading one zip >>>file >>> >and >>> >> using it in IDE. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Om >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Piotr >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala >>><bigosma...@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package all the >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks, >>> >> > Om >>> >> > >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the better. The >>> >> decisions >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as possible >>>and >>> >>make >>> >> > our >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release often. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >>> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>> >> > > wrote: >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your merge. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> Patreon: >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb14108fd4443 >>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 >>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&rese >>rved=0 >> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb14108fd4443 >>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 >>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&rese >>rved=0>* >> > > > >-- > >Piotr Zarzycki > >Patreon: >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb14108fd444342 >bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814158 >77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reserved >=0 ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cb14108fd444342 >bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814158 >77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reserved >=0>*
