Ok I will wait for your final push to develop. In any case it looks good till now.
Once you update Readme I can make a build - I haven't done ant build for a while. Thanks, Piotr On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, 08:38 Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Piotr, > > I have all 3 feature/rename branches merged into the develop branch > locally. I'm not sure it is necessary to merge the other way first, > especially in royale-asjs because most of the changes were in the compiler. > > I was going to push it tomorrow (for me) so I can babysit the CI servers > if they don't pass since I haven't tested the merge on Windows (the CI > server has built and ran tests on Windows on feature/rename). > > I can hold off if folks want to do more testing on feature/rename before > the merge to develop. > > Regarding Flash dependencies, I would like to see some folks use a clean > machine or try to simulate a clean machine (by removing folders and > environment variables) and see if they can get the repos and build > everything, although that reminds me that I need to update the various > READMEs first. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 12/5/17, 11:19 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Hi Alex, > > > >I did merge develop into rename for asjs repo locally, but not sure > >whether > >I can push it to the rename - let me know. > >Apart of that you have said that you need volunteers that check whether > >there are still places with dependencies to Flash. - What do you mean by > >that actually ? Do you mean making build on branches ? I did it by maven > >but not sure whether it is sufficient. > > > >I did also use your rename branch with Moonshine and everything looks ok. > > > >I have also discovered that in the following locations for all modules > >"frameworks\js\projects\BasicJS\target\" we have swc - probably it should > >be excluded in the distribution package build for ant. > > > >Thanks, Piotr > > > >2017-12-03 12:53 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[email protected]>: > > > >> In that place I think we should have Wiki page called: "How to download > >> IDE ready Royale framework" - or something similar. It should describe > >>what > >> kind of package do we have and what people need to do in order to have > >>SWF > >> output. > >> > >> I don't think we should have in the title word "binary package" - It > >> wasn't mean to me anything when I come up to Apache Flex project. I > >>believe > >> there could be more people like me. > >> > >> Thanks, Piotr > >> > >> > >> 2017-12-03 8:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> I'm going to try to reply to everyone else in this one post... > >>> > >>> Today, for folks just wanting to write an app with Royale, the nightly > >>>for > >>> "JSOnly" has everything you need to create JS output, but not SWF > >>>output. > >>> The nightly for the "FlexJS" package does not (and can never) bundle > >>>the > >>> Adobe playerglobal and airglobal needed to generate SWF output. The > >>> "FlexJS" nightly contains an Ant script to copy in the Adobe bits after > >>> you download them. > >>> > >>> And now, I am proposing to change this packaging so that the source zip > >>> will contain 3 folders representing the 3 repos (royals-compiler, > >>> royals-typedefs, royale-asjs) and without more fiddling, the JSOnly > >>>binary > >>> artifact will contain what is currently in the "JSOnly" nightly but in > >>>a > >>> royale-asjs folder and be otherwise ready to go for Flash Builder and > >>> other IDEs, and the "FlexJS" binary artifact will again require > >>>running an > >>> Ant script to position the Adobe bits. > >>> > >>> For these IDE users, SWF functionality is essentially something you > >>>choose > >>> early when deciding what package to download. I'm not sure how, under > >>> Apache rules, to create a binary artifact that is an add-in of the > >>> SWF-only bits. Binary artifacts are supposed to be the results of a > >>> compilation of a source package. I suppose we could create some sort > >>>of > >>> script that overlays the SWF-only bits over a JSOnly binary. > >>> > >>> Meanwhile, to answer Carlos's question, I think for Maven users you > >>>choose > >>> to get SWF output merely by adding the Adobe airglobal/playerglobal > >>> dependencies to your POM. These dependencies are in by default for the > >>> examples. Although it occurs to me that MDLExample shouldn't have > >>>them, > >>> so maybe I'll double-check that when I have time tomorrow. > >>> > >>> I will have limited time to work on this until tomorrow night. > >>> > >>> HTH, > >>> -Alex > >>> > >>> On 12/2/17, 1:14 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of OmPrakash > >>>Muppirala" > >>> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> >On Dec 2, 2017 11:20 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> > >>> >wrote: > >>> > > >>> >As an application developer no. You are getting that package [1] and > >>>have > >>> >everything what you need to build app to swf an js. > >>> > > >>> >[1] > >>> >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A% > >>> 2F%2Fapacheflex > >>> >build.cloudapp.net%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui% > >>> 40adobe.co > >>> >m%7Cacd29e28cb594f6788fd08d539c9a8ff%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae > >>> d2c178decee1%7C > >>> >0%7C0%7C636478460681913302&sdata=84IVbhNcVYNkti7qeE%2B6VeEJ > >>> 7E8uDM0y9NDychV > >>> >bYvc%3D&reserved=0 > >>> >asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/ > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >That's good to know. I should be able to use this in the npm package > >>> >right? > >>> > > >>> >Thanks, > >>> >Om > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >Thanks, Piotr > >>> > > >>> >On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 19:33 OmPrakash Muppirala <[email protected]> > >>> >wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> On Dec 2, 2017 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected] > > > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Hi Om, > >>> >> > >>> >> Not sure what do you mean? We have it. You are downloading one zip > >>>file > >>> >and > >>> >> using it in IDE. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Are we not downloading falcon, gcc etc separately? > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks, > >>> >> Om > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> Piotr > >>> >> > >>> >> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017, 17:30 OmPrakash Muppirala > >>><[email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> > With this setup, can we have the binary release package all the > >>> >> > dependencies in one zip file? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Thanks, > >>> >> > Om > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Dec 2, 2017 8:25 AM, "Harbs" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I don’t have much to add. For me, the simpler, the better. The > >>> >> decisions > >>> >> > > should be to get the first release out as quickly as possible > >>>and > >>> >>make > >>> >> > our > >>> >> > > release process as easy as it can be so we can release often. > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > On Dec 2, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < > >>> >> [email protected]> > >>> >> > > wrote: > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > I would also see in the develop Harbs > >>> >> > > > changes with namespaces before release, after your merge. > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > I’ll try to finish that up tomorrow. > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > >> Patreon: > >>* > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7Cb14108fd4443 > >>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > >>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&rese > >>rved=0 > >> > >>< > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat > >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7Cb14108fd4443 > >>42bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814 > >>15877839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&rese > >>rved=0>* > >> > > > > > > > >-- > > > >Piotr Zarzycki > > > >Patreon: > >* > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr > >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7Cb14108fd444342 > >bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814158 > >77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reserved > >=0 > >< > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr > >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com > %7Cb14108fd444342 > >bdb2b108d53c79ba28%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364814158 > >77839045&sdata=br%2F4ewsBWblNGYXfpJXrQaqGhQqD%2F3XJcedj3XNPMfs%3D&reserved > >=0>* > >
