I’ll try to work on it on Sunday.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> ANT and Maven build on branch is working right now. Please test your stuff.
>
> Carlos,
>
> Please take a look into RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData because I
> have commented out that line. Probably something won't work. Let me know
> how it's looks like.
> If you won't have time next wee let me know I will test Jewel on my own on
> Monday.
>
> Alina,
>
> I need your testing on that branch to make sure that I didn't break
> anything. I have merged all stuff from MXRoyale, so basically there is
> everything there.
>
> Harbs,
>
> I will be waiting for your changes which you have been talking about
> earlier.
>
> Let's make this release happen!
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
>> Harbs,
>>
>> Can you jump to feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop and try build there? It
>> will help me with all of that. This branch contains merged develop and
>> MXRoyale.
>> I'm assuming you are using ANT.
>>
>> As for that line in DataGridView I have change it to DataGridColumnList.
>> Please make changes if needed to something else on that branch. This branch
>> will be merged to develop once everyone tell me that I didn't break
>> anything. :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:16 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>
>>> The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant.
>>>
>>> Are you building with ant or maven?
>>>
>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Scratch that.
>>>>
>>>> It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from
>>> IItemRendererProvider
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue
>>> with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns.
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is
>>> used
>>>>>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment
>>>>>>
>>>>>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is
>>>>>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>>>
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>> <
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think
>>> we all
>>>>>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all
>>> positions
>>>>>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate
>>> are new,
>>>>>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get
>>> what we
>>>>>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link
>>> basic, so
>>>>>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible,
>>>>>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions
>>> of
>>>>>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I
>>> was in
>>>>>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel
>>> since
>>>>>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too
>>> much of
>>>>>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that
>>> this
>>>>>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that
>>> could be
>>>>>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't
>>> want to
>>>>>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with
>>> those
>>>>>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you
>>> to put
>>>>>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking
>>> how to
>>>>>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when
>>>>>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change
>>> in
>>>>>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that
>>> Basic is
>>>>>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can
>>> use it.
>>>>>>> And Jewel can't use.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't see other way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's see this as we end this release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with
>>>>>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <
>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so
>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent.
>>>>>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move
>>> it
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel.
>>>>>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but
>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it
>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration
>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from
>>>>>>>> Basic
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in
>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these
>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can
>>>>>>>> pull
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably I
>>>>>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :)
>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in
>>>>>>>>> interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface
>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent
>>>>>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework
>>>>>>>>> ...........................
>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts
>>>>>>>>> ....................
>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs
>>>>>>>>> .....................
>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core
>>>>>>>>> ...............
>>>>>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding
>>>>>>>>> ............
>>>>>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was
>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still
>>>>>>>> unsolved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>> MX
>>>>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to
>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>> For now
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic
>>>>>>>>>> library
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> could be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to
>>>>>>>>>>> compile with
>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll
>>>>>>> return
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>> duties
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> isuue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> Royale. One
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> develop. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> develop
>>>>>>>>>>>> now is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch
>>>>>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>> to ask
>>>>>>>>>>>> you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end -
>>>>>>> whether I
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> break any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please
>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>> changes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some
>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>> examples ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see
>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration
>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>> moreover
>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then
>>>>>>>> solve
>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is
>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration
>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for
>>>>>>>>>>> projects. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master
>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of
>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>> builds. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the
>>>>>>>> agent
>>>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>>>>> fine as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not
>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2]
>>>>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in
>>>>>>>>>> Program
>>>>>>>>>>>> Files. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is
>>>>>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0
>>> <
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0
>>> <
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>> with all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs <
>>>>>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with
>>>>>>> ACE
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first
>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>> ant on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not
>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>> sure what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> triggered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on
>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunno…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>>>>>> for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next
>>>>>>>>>> couple
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this,
>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>> find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the
>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>> began to
>>>>>>>>>>>> fail
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>> it was
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the
>>>>>>>> screen
>>>>>>>>>> (to
>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>> tests)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and
>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues
>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> probably a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place.
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>>>> did all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is
>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>> of any
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> slight
>>>>>>>>>>>> preference
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex
>>>>>>>> working,
>>>>>>>>>>> but if
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the
>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was
>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>> pondering just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> "master"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this
>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>> issue with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>> module
>>>>>>>>>>>> Icons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr
>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to
>>>>>>>>>>> build.xml, if
>>>>>>>>>>>> it won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr
>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> exist" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is
>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>> to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files
>>>>>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr
>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about
>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> build on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will
>>>>>>>>>> attach
>>>>>>>>>>> dev
>>>>>>>>>>>> list and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos
>>>>>>>> Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over,
>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for
>>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>>>>> "post
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the
>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this
>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>> safe to
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days
>>>>>>> wanting
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> finish
>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an
>>>>>>>> stable
>>>>>>>>>>> way, for
>>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List
>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> update data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I
>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>> points
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start
>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>> in real
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a
>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to
>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>> points).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope
>>>>>>>>>>> something of
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35,
>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>> (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The
>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe
>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash
>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already
>>>>>>> pushed
>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>> npm [1],
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM
>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last
>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing
>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have
>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>> unfinished
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting
>>>>>>> leave
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will
>>>>>>>> study
>>>>>>>>>>> carefully
>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the
>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing
>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> cleaned up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask
>>>>>>>> infra
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> advice. [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in
>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up
>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch -
>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> merge it
>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> release ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
