Now that I’m able to compile, I started testing the current state…

Why was DataContainerBase changed?

DataContainerBase.removeAllItemRenderers no longer exists. 
DataItemRendererFactoryForArrayList.dataProviderChangeHandler calls 
dataGroup.removeAllItemRenderers() on a List which now fails with a RTE because 
removeAllItemRenderers is undefined.

> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:42 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I’ll try to work on it on Sunday.
> 
>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 3:29 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Guys,
>> 
>> ANT and Maven build on branch is working right now. Please test your stuff.
>> 
>> Carlos,
>> 
>> Please take a look into RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData because I
>> have commented out that line. Probably something won't work. Let me know
>> how it's looks like.
>> If you won't have time next wee let me know I will test Jewel on my own on
>> Monday.
>> 
>> Alina,
>> 
>> I need your testing on that branch to make sure that I didn't break
>> anything. I have merged all stuff from MXRoyale, so basically there is
>> everything there.
>> 
>> Harbs,
>> 
>> I will be waiting for your changes which you have been talking about
>> earlier.
>> 
>> Let's make this release happen!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>> 
>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> Harbs,
>>> 
>>> Can you jump to feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop and try build there? It
>>> will help me with all of that. This branch contains merged develop and
>>> MXRoyale.
>>> I'm assuming you are using ANT.
>>> 
>>> As for that line in DataGridView I have change it to DataGridColumnList.
>>> Please make changes if needed to something else on that branch. This branch
>>> will be merged to develop once everyone tell me that I didn't break
>>> anything. :)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>> 
>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:16 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>>> 
>>>> The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant.
>>>> 
>>>> Are you building with ant or maven?
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Scratch that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from
>>>> IItemRendererProvider
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue
>>>> with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is
>>>> used
>>>>>>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer;
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is
>>>>>>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>>> <
>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>>> <
>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org
>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Piotr,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think
>>>> we all
>>>>>>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all
>>>> positions
>>>>>>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate
>>>> are new,
>>>>>>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get
>>>> what we
>>>>>>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link
>>>> basic, so
>>>>>>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible,
>>>>>>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions
>>>> of
>>>>>>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I
>>>> was in
>>>>>>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel
>>>> since
>>>>>>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too
>>>> much of
>>>>>>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that
>>>> this
>>>>>>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that
>>>> could be
>>>>>>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't
>>>> want to
>>>>>>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with
>>>> those
>>>>>>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you
>>>> to put
>>>>>>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking
>>>> how to
>>>>>>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when
>>>>>>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change
>>>> in
>>>>>>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that
>>>> Basic is
>>>>>>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can
>>>> use it.
>>>>>>>> And Jewel can't use.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Don't see other way.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Let's see this as we end this release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with
>>>>>>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira <
>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent.
>>>>>>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move
>>>> it
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel.
>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but
>>>>>>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it
>>>> working.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> integration branch.  However, the Maven build in the integration
>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> still failing.  It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from
>>>>>>>>> Basic
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> Core.  The Ant build should be failing there too.  I was under
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in
>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.  Someone else will have to deal with resolving these
>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>  Great! Thanks Alex!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>  czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid
>>>> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can
>>>>>>>>> pull
>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :)
>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  time I will look into that tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in
>>>>>>>>>> interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>               ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea
>>>>>>>>>>>> implements
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>               ^
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> *------------------------------------------------------------------------*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent
>>>>>>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT
>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework
>>>>>>>>>> ...........................
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts
>>>>>>>>>> ....................
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs
>>>>>>>>>> .....................
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core
>>>>>>>>>> ...............
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding
>>>>>>>>>> ............
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was
>>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still
>>>>>>>>> unsolved.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced
>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>> MX
>>>>>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to
>>>>>>>> add
>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> For now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic
>>>>>>>>>>> library
>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to
>>>>>>>>>>>> compile with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll
>>>>>>>> return
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> duties
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> find
>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>> isuue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>)
>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale. One
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> develop
>>>>>>>>>>>>> now is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>> to ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end -
>>>>>>>> whether I
>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> break any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please
>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some
>>>>>>>>>> Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> examples ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see
>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> happen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration
>>>>>>>>> branch,
>>>>>>>>>>>> moreover
>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then
>>>>>>>>> solve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conflicts in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is
>>>>>>>> compiling
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration
>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for
>>>>>>>>>>>> projects.  I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master
>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wherever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing.  In theory, royale-compiler
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should  be able to be built off master, and the
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of
>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>> builds.  If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the
>>>>>>>>> agent
>>>>>>>>>>>> that's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not
>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> master.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1]  [2]
>>>>>>>>>> It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pointing for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in
>>>>>>>>>>> Program
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files. How
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> path
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  is appear there ? What actually is
>>>>>>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *[1] **
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *[2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Thanks,*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  *Piotr*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you
>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> done
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs <
>>>>>>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with
>>>>>>>> ACE
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> machines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first
>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>> ant on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not
>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>> sure what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> triggered
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunno…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop
>>>>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next
>>>>>>>>>>> couple
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this,
>>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> find it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the
>>>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>>>>>>> began to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci.  The only way I was able
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> fix
>>>>>>>>>>>> it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the
>>>>>>>>> screen
>>>>>>>>>>> (to
>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and
>>>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent.  Any build issues
>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place.
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> did all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is
>>>>>>>>>> independent
>>>>>>>>>>>> of any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> slight
>>>>>>>>>>>>> preference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex
>>>>>>>>> working,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the
>>>>>>>>>> merge
>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me.  I was
>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> pondering just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> "master"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this
>>>>>>>> fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build. -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> module
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Icons.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr
>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to
>>>>>>>>>>>> build.xml, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr
>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing
>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs
>>>>>>>>> does
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist" and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is
>>>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files
>>>>>>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr
>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about
>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will
>>>>>>>>>>> attach
>>>>>>>>>>>> dev
>>>>>>>>>>>>> list and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos
>>>>>>>>> Rovira <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over,
>>>>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for
>>>>>>>>> releases
>>>>>>>>>>>> "post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> making
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this
>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>> safe to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days
>>>>>>>> wanting
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> finish
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an
>>>>>>>>> stable
>>>>>>>>>>>> way, for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List
>>>>>>>>> remove
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> update data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>> three
>>>>>>>>>>>>> points
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start
>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>> in real
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a
>>>>>>>>>> real
>>>>>>>>>>>> project
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to
>>>>>>>>> complete
>>>>>>>>>>>> these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> points).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope
>>>>>>>>>>>> something of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35,
>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The
>>>>>>>>>>> question
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe
>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>>>> part
>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash
>>>>>>>>>>>> Muppirala <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already
>>>>>>>> pushed
>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>> via
>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm [1],
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM
>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>> Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> <mailto:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last
>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing
>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have
>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfinished
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting
>>>>>>>> leave
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will
>>>>>>>>> study
>>>>>>>>>>>> carefully
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the
>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing
>>>>>>>>> typedefs
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleaned up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask
>>>>>>>>> infra
>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice. [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in
>>>>>>>> case
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch -
>>>>>>>> Can
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> release ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&amp;sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>>>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>*
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>> 
>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>> 
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> 


Reply via email to