Guys, ANT and Maven build on branch is working right now. Please test your stuff.
Carlos, Please take a look into RemoveTableItemRendererForArrayListData because I have commented out that line. Probably something won't work. Let me know how it's looks like. If you won't have time next wee let me know I will test Jewel on my own on Monday. Alina, I need your testing on that branch to make sure that I didn't break anything. I have merged all stuff from MXRoyale, so basically there is everything there. Harbs, I will be waiting for your changes which you have been talking about earlier. Let's make this release happen! Thanks, Piotr pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:23 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Harbs, > > Can you jump to feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop and try build there? It > will help me with all of that. This branch contains merged develop and > MXRoyale. > I'm assuming you are using ANT. > > As for that line in DataGridView I have change it to DataGridColumnList. > Please make changes if needed to something else on that branch. This branch > will be merged to develop once everyone tell me that I didn't break > anything. :) > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pt., 31 sie 2018 o 13:16 Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > >> The build passes for me on the latest develop branch using ant. >> >> Are you building with ant or maven? >> >> > On Aug 31, 2018, at 2:13 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Scratch that. >> > >> > It does have an itemRenderer property and it inherits from >> IItemRendererProvider >> > >> >> On Aug 31, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto: >> harbs.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> That change should be reverted. I added it to try and fix an issue >> with Express, but Express data grids don’t mix with Basic columns. >> >> >> >>> On Aug 31, 2018, at 12:37 PM, Piotr Zarzycki < >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Harbs, >> >>> >> >>> Some time ago you have added interface IDataGridColumnList [1]. It is >> used >> >>> here [2], couple of lines later there is assignment >> >>> >> >>> list.itemRenderer = dataGridColumn.itemRenderer; >> >>> >> >>> But that interface doesn't have itemRenderer property and build is >> >>> failing - locally. How actually it is working ? >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as >> < >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/IDataGridColumnList.as >> > >> >>> [2] >> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 >> < >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/75f379c72732cd208f535f6f029cfc0b2efe0ee4/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DataGridView.as#L229 >> > >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Piotr >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> pt., 31 sie 2018 o 10:33 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org >> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> napisał(a): >> >>> >> >>>> Piotr, >> >>>> >> >>>> for me its ok, but only want to point something important. I think >> we all >> >>>> invested many emails, hours in discussing about this. I think all >> positions >> >>>> are clear. I think we can discuss if things to bring to the plate >> are new, >> >>>> but I'm afraid it could not be. My position is that we all can get >> what we >> >>>> want. I think is: 1) return things to basic 2) jewel can't link >> basic, so >> >>>> it must create it's own versions. In case this could not be possible, >> >>>> create a JewelCore SWC. My latest experience creating Jewel versions >> of >> >>>> DateField, DateChooser, Table, ComboBox and DropDownList show that I >> was in >> >>>> the right track, since the things I copied are modified for Jewel >> since >> >>>> Jewel needs other things and implementations. In Basic there's too >> much of >> >>>> the styles and view hardcoded in the main code and that means that >> this >> >>>> kind of code, for me, never can be generalistic piece of code that >> could be >> >>>> reusable for all UIs. As well it seems Basic UI, TLCs and CSS don't >> want to >> >>>> be separated and anyone wanting to extend it will need to deal with >> those >> >>>> dependencies, what is not acceptable. Framework code should help you >> to put >> >>>> the Pilars of other high level things without the need of looking >> how to >> >>>> workaround many things set up, this is what I find in Basic code when >> >>>> trying to use in Jewel. It could be a way if things could be change >> in >> >>>> Basic for the better, but seems that many people here things that >> Basic is >> >>>> now in a near-final-shape, so no changes means, (I at least), can >> use it. >> >>>> And Jewel can't use. >> >>>> >> >>>> Don't see other way. >> >>>> >> >>>> Let's see this as we end this release. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thanks >> >>>> >> >>>> Carlos >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 7:27, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> >>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >> >>>> escribió: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi Carlos, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Please do not move anything more. I think I had enough problems with >> >>>>> current situations. I will deal with all of that as is. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> My suggestion is to restart discussion about all of that stuff after >> >>>>> release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> Piotr >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 12:18 AM Carlos Rovira < >> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hi, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> as we discussed, the package names was the revert we said to do, so >> >>>> when >> >>>>> we >> >>>>>> do a refactor of that package names, will be more consistent. >> >>>>>> Regarding movement of pieces, in the case of DataGroup I can move >> it >> >>>> from >> >>>>>> Core to Basic and create a version for Jewel. >> >>>>>> Let me know if this is ok for you. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> As well let me know if some more class is in Core to consider. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 19:18, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> >>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >> escribió: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I was also thinking that this release won't have that changes, but >> >>>>>>> unfortunately they are there. I had big headache to make it >> working. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Thank you Alex. I will try to deal with all of that. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 19:12 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid>> >> >>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I fixed the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale and merged it into >> the >> >>>>>>>> integration branch. However, the Maven build in the integration >> >>>>> branch >> >>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> still failing. It appears to be because DataGroup got moved from >> >>>>> Basic >> >>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> Core. The Ant build should be failing there too. I was under >> the >> >>>>>>>> impression that these sorts of changes were not going to be in >> this >> >>>>>>>> release. Someone else will have to deal with resolving these >> >>>> issues. >> >>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>> don’t want to stop my other work to figure them out. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks Alex! >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 18:05 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I will fix the Maven build in feature/MXRoyale then you can >> >>>>> pull >> >>>>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>>> changes into the integration branch. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On 8/30/18, 7:42 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> >>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Nope. I build repo only using ANT. Do you know how to fix >> >>>>>> that >> >>>>>>> ? >> >>>>>>>>> Probably I >> >>>>>>>>> missed some conflicts, not sure why Maven complaining. :) >> >>>>> If >> >>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>> won't >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>> time I will look into that tomorrow. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> czw., 30 sie 2018 o 16:24 Carlos Rovira < >> >>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I switched to the feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop >> >>>>>>>>>> then try to pass maven and fails just at the begining >> >>>>>>>>>> I saw that has 2 rat check fails, so I fixed it >> >>>>>>>>>> but now I'm seeing more problems >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >> >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 Error: interface method numItemRenderers in >> >>>>>> interface >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent not implemented by class DataGroup >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >> >>>>>>>> implements >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> ^ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> /Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Royale/Source/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/supportClasses/DataGroup.as(39): >> >>>>>>>>>> col: 18 interface method numItemRenderers in interface >> >>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >> >>>>>>>>>> not implemented by class DataGroup >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> public class DataGroup extends ContainerContentArea >> >>>>>>>> implements >> >>>>>>>>>> IItemRendererParent >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> ^ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.666093134 seconds >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> *------------------------------------------------------------------------* >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary:* >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Parent >> >>>> 0.9.3-SNAPSHOT >> >>>>>> .... >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >> >>>>>>>>>> 2.164 s] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework >> >>>>>> ........................... >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >> >>>>>>>>>> 0.273 s] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Fonts >> >>>>>> .................... >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.175 s] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs >> >>>>>> ..................... >> >>>>>>>>> *SUCCESS* [ >> >>>>>>>>>> 0.691 s] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Core >> >>>>>> ............... >> >>>>>>>>> *FAILURE* [ >> >>>>>>>>>> 1.947 s] >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Framework: Libs: Binding >> >>>>>> ............ >> >>>>>>>>> *SKIPPED* >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> So I'm a bit confused. I thought the branch was >> >>>> compiling >> >>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> tested >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>> some point, but it seems that conflicts are still >> >>>>> unsolved. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> For example in this error, seems MXRoyale introduced >> >>>> some >> >>>>>> MX >> >>>>>>>> API >> >>>>>>>>> that is >> >>>>>>>>>> not in Royale core classes until now, so it needs to >> >>>> add >> >>>>>> it. >> >>>>>>>> For now >> >>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>> only reports this fails, but maybe when it reach Basic >> >>>>>>> library >> >>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>> could be >> >>>>>>>>>> much more than that...so my question is, did you try to >> >>>>>>>> compile with >> >>>>>>>>> maven >> >>>>>>>>>> the branch? if so did you find this problems? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Or maybe I'm missing something? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Let me know in order to know how to operate. I'll >> >>>> return >> >>>>> to >> >>>>>>> my >> >>>>>>>> Jewel >> >>>>>>>>> duties >> >>>>>>>>>> in the meanwhile >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >> >>>>>>>>>> Carlos >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 16:04, Carlos Rovira (< >> >>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ) >> >>>>>>>>>> escribió: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> of course, I'll try all Jewel examples and report if >> >>>> I >> >>>>>> find >> >>>>>>>> some >> >>>>>>>>> isuue. >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> El jue., 30 ago. 2018 a las 15:33, Piotr Zarzycki (< >> >>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>>) >> escribió: >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alina, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working on preparation to release next version >> >>>> of >> >>>>>>>> Royale. One >> >>>>>>>>> of the >> >>>>>>>>>>>> steps were to merge everything what is in MXRoyale >> >>>>>> branch >> >>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> develop. I >> >>>>>>>>>>>> just finished it and everything what was in MXRoyale >> >>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> develop >> >>>>>>>>> now is >> >>>>>>>>>>>> being merged to special branch >> >>>>>>>> feature/Merge_MXRoyale_To_Develop. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Before I merge all that stuff back to develop I >> >>>> would >> >>>>>> like >> >>>>>>>> to ask >> >>>>>>>>> you to >> >>>>>>>>>>>> switch to that branch and test on your end - >> >>>> whether I >> >>>>>>>> didn't >> >>>>>>>>> break any >> >>>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>>>>> your stuff. Is something is being missed - please >> >>>> make >> >>>>>>>> changes and >> >>>>>>>>>> commit >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to that branch. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Carlos, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Can you switch to that branch as well and test some >> >>>>>> Jewel >> >>>>>>>>> examples ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to build Tour De Flex tomorrow to see >> >>>> what >> >>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> happen. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wt., 28 sie 2018 o 19:18 Carlos Rovira < >> >>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Piotr, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the recommended way is to create a integration >> >>>>> branch, >> >>>>>>>> moreover >> >>>>>>>>> since >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> MXRoyale has gone many time in its own way. Then >> >>>>> solve >> >>>>>>>>> conflicts in >> >>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> branch until you see is stable and all is >> >>>> compiling >> >>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> working >> >>>>>>>>> fine >> >>>>>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> expected, then merge into develop the integration >> >>>>>>> branch. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good luck! :) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 19:00, Alex Harui >> >>>>>>>>>> (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Master and agent have their own root folders for >> >>>>>>>> projects. I >> >>>>>>>>> think >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Agent >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is running in c:\Jenkins\workspace and master >> >>>> may >> >>>>> be >> >>>>>>>> running >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>> wherever >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> APPDATA is pointing. In theory, royale-compiler >> >>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> royale-typedefs >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should be able to be built off master, and the >> >>>>>> other >> >>>>>>>> builds >> >>>>>>>>> should >> >>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> able >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use Ant variables to point to the results of >> >>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>>> builds. If >> >>>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> want >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to try switching everything off master to the >> >>>>> agent >> >>>>>>>> that's >> >>>>>>>>> fine as >> >>>>>>>>>>>> well. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, there were some builds that would not >> >>>> run >> >>>>> on >> >>>>>>>> master. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/28/18, 9:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> >>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see failing mustellaresultsparser [1] [2] >> >>>>>> It's >> >>>>>>>>> pointing for >> >>>>>>>>>>>> some >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to c:/jenkins/workspace instead those one in >> >>>>>>> Program >> >>>>>>>>> Files. How >> >>>>>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> path >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is appear there ? What actually is >> >>>>>>> ${env.APPDATA} ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[1] ** >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >> < >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >> < >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fb060cbd9eb5e31932fe06cd35d4a72c86a6c6761%2Fbuild.xml%23L1510&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o1K4rg2yZAs%2BMRHo96%2F3fdntd4EkAaCupd2h9kjNZ6Q%3D&reserved=0 >> > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *[2] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F1230%2FconsoleFull&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=mQlivPliz5SQ4D%2BjlyxKmwC8fxDhL5bKorbRVLBeu8w%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Thanks,* >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Piotr* >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:18 Piotr Zarzycki < >> >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Harbs, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please give me some sign here once you >> >>>> will >> >>>>> be >> >>>>>>>> done >> >>>>>>>>> with all >> >>>>>>>>>>>> your >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes! >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 20:12 Harbs < >> >>>>>>>> harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have found that there’s an error with >> >>>> ACE >> >>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>> multiple >> >>>>>>>>>>>> machines. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only able to get it to build by first >> >>>>> running >> >>>>>>>> ant on >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>> typedefs >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then the asjs repo succeeded. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it worked fine, so I’m not >> >>>>> really >> >>>>>>>> sure what >> >>>>>>>>>>>> triggered >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this is related to the failures on >> >>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci? >> >>>>>>>>>> Dunno… >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan on making sure the current develop >> >>>>>>> branch >> >>>>>>>> works >> >>>>>>>>> for me >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixing >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any issues that might crop up in the next >> >>>>>>> couple >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> days. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is also some code which needs to be >> >>>>>>>>> cherry-picked from >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert-refactor branch. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:25 PM, Alex Harui >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought I'd sent an email about this, >> >>>>>> but I >> >>>>>>>> can't >> >>>>>>>>> find it >> >>>>>>>>>>>> so I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For some reason, some weeks ago, the >> >>>>> builds >> >>>>>>>> began to >> >>>>>>>>> fail >> >>>>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apacheroyaleci. The only way I was able >> >>>> to >> >>>>>> fix >> >>>>>>>> it was >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>> create a >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkins >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent and move builds that needed the >> >>>>> screen >> >>>>>>> (to >> >>>>>>>> run >> >>>>>>>>> tests) >> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> agent. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In theory, royale-compiler and >> >>>>>> royale-typedefs >> >>>>>>>> should >> >>>>>>>>> still >> >>>>>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> able >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master build agent. Any build issues >> >>>>>> here >> >>>>>>>> are >> >>>>>>>>> probably a >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matter of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the right Ant variables in place. >> >>>>> I >> >>>>>>>> think it >> >>>>>>>>> did all >> >>>>>>>>>>>> work >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at one >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point in time after I made the agent. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That said, I think this issue is >> >>>>>> independent >> >>>>>>>> of any >> >>>>>>>>> issues >> >>>>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.a.o >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with Maven. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding releasing in general, I have >> >>>> a >> >>>>>>> slight >> >>>>>>>>> preference >> >>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wait a >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit until I get more of Tour De Flex >> >>>>> working, >> >>>>>>>> but if >> >>>>>>>>> I'm not >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> RM >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't have to spend time figuring out the >> >>>>>> merge >> >>>>>>>> from >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> develop, it doesn't matter to me. I was >> >>>>> also >> >>>>>>>>> pondering just >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing from >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feature/MXRoyale. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Alex >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/27/18, 7:03 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have switched two build on jenkins >> >>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> "master" >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs_jsonly >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs - It seems that this >> >>>> fixes >> >>>>>>>> issue with >> >>>>>>>>>> build. - >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can stay like that. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm working right now to fix build >> >>>> for >> >>>>>>>> module >> >>>>>>>>> Icons. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 15:06 Piotr >> >>>>>> Zarzycki < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to commit some changes to >> >>>>>>>> build.xml, if >> >>>>>>>>> it won't >> >>>>>>>>>>>> work >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert it. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pon., 27 sie 2018 o 14:12 Piotr >> >>>>> Zarzycki < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I looked into the current failing >> >>>> build >> >>>>>>> [1]. >> >>>>>>>> It >> >>>>>>>>>> complaining >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Basedir >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs >> >>>>> does >> >>>>>>> not >> >>>>>>>>> exist" and >> >>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct, because "royale-typedefs" is >> >>>>>> being >> >>>>>>>> build >> >>>>>>>>> to that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> folder >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "C:\Program >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Files >> >>>>>>>> (x86)\Jenkins\workspace\royale-typedefs". >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone changed that and why ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=KZ%2FAioXVDj1JjAUxTzHrWPsGaNHucim%2BBYU%2BO5znvII%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> niedz., 26 sie 2018 o 15:11 Piotr >> >>>>>> Zarzycki >> >>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to notify Infra about >> >>>>> problem >> >>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>>> build on >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b.a.o. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Locally >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything is perfectly fine. I will >> >>>>>>> attach >> >>>>>>>> dev >> >>>>>>>>> list and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> write >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> email >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org <mailto: >> >>>>>>>>> us...@infra.apache.org>. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 16:05 Carlos >> >>>>> Rovira < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> carlosrov...@apache.org >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:carlosrov...@apache.org>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great Piotr!, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you said discussion is not over, >> >>>>>> but I >> >>>>>>>> think >> >>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>>>> discussed >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lots of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things and plans was left for >> >>>>> releases >> >>>>>>>> "post >> >>>>>>>>> 0.9.3". In >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> fact I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package name changes that was the >> >>>>> only >> >>>>>>>> point >> >>>>>>>>> that was >> >>>>>>>>>>>> making >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3. So I think we are at this >> >>>>> point >> >>>>>>>> safe to >> >>>>>>>>> release >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.3, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.4 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we want to call it :) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I must say that I'm this days >> >>>> wanting >> >>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> finish >> >>>>>>>>> some >> >>>>>>>>>>>> things >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in Jewel >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will make it pretty usable in an >> >>>>> stable >> >>>>>>>> way, for >> >>>>>>>>> me >> >>>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> points are: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * End Jewel Table and Jewel List >> >>>>> remove >> >>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> update data >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel NumericStepper >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Jewel DropdownList/Combobox >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's much more to do, but I >> >>>> think >> >>>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>> three >> >>>>>>>>> points >> >>>>>>>>>>>> will >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> make >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people have the minimun to start >> >>>>>> working >> >>>>>>>> in real >> >>>>>>>>> Apache >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale Jewel >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (at least is what I need to start a >> >>>>>> real >> >>>>>>>> project >> >>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>>>>> now >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale, so I'm working hard to >> >>>>> complete >> >>>>>>>> these >> >>>>>>>>> points). >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to make this asap, so hope >> >>>>>>>> something of >> >>>>>>>>> those >> >>>>>>>>>>>> point >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could go >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release :) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> El vie., 24 ago. 2018 a las 0:35, >> >>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>> Zarzycki >> >>>>>>>>> (< >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com <mailto: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> escribió: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Om, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have no objections to that. The >> >>>>>>> question >> >>>>>>>>> whether >> >>>>>>>>>> from >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> technical >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of view Maven which is I believe >> >>>> big >> >>>>>>> part >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> release >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> process >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complain. We will see. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for confirmation, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pt., 24 sie 2018 o 00:25 OmPrakash >> >>>>>>>> Muppirala < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bigosma...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> napisał(a): >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, since 0.9.3 was already >> >>>> pushed >> >>>>>> out >> >>>>>>>> via >> >>>>>>>>> npm [1], >> >>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best if >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> skip to 0.9.4 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmjs.com%2Fpackage%2F%40apache-royale%2Froyale-js&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=woA5whSxbRmKKrpUyVZAXb0CiIPOgbmeKIpA3cVfuRk%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 1:53 PM >> >>>>> Piotr >> >>>>>>>> Zarzycki >> >>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >>>> <mailto: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since last >> >>>>> version >> >>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> Royale was >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> released. I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to start process of releasing >> >>>>>> current >> >>>>>>>> version >> >>>>>>>>> no >> >>>>>>>>>>>> matter >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right now. I know that we have >> >>>>>>> probably >> >>>>>>>>> unfinished >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discussion >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> core changes. I'm suggesting >> >>>> leave >> >>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>> for the >> >>>>>>>>> next >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I'm >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volunteer >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be release manager. I will >> >>>>> study >> >>>>>>>> carefully >> >>>>>>>>> what >> >>>>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> here >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to get help with all of the >> >>>>>>> issues. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see that we have failing >> >>>>> typedefs >> >>>>>> - >> >>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> cleaned up >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> workspace and >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again. If #576 fail I will ask >> >>>>> infra >> >>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>>> advice. [2] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Om, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do I need to know anything in >> >>>> case >> >>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> release >> >>>>>>>>> Royale >> >>>>>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> npm ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your last >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggestion here [3] is still up >> >>>> ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex, >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about emulation branch - >> >>>> Can >> >>>>> I >> >>>>>>>> merge it >> >>>>>>>>> into >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> develop ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything what can hold >> >>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> release ? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=EF1xZuMv0s0mm35yF%2FLdyx2gbG9Qg241W%2BKHfq05MYU%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbuilds.apache.org%2Fjob%2Froyale-typedefs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=R%2Bt2Ukn3bDXPHMsqkN5uEG7CWQRUD9twoJvYoHfO%2FAw%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-royale-development.20373.n8.nabble.com%2F0-9-3-Release-tp3872p4520.html&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C28430a821a0748d1bf8508d60e92d971%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636712421208954700&sdata=o79uh3p5m2RnjzBKkftGdU3XPAg51Mi46x0km7tw8m8%3D&reserved=0 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> >>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < >> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki> >> >>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki < >> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>* >> >> >> > >> >> > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
