I think the granule ingester and collection manager have some common code components so it might make more sense for something like: -apache-sdapv1.0.0 -sdap-nexus-webapp -src -sdap-ingester -common -src -sdap-collection-manager -src -sdap-granule-ingester -src
On 11/2/22, 4:14 PM, "Frank Greguska" <fg...@apache.org> wrote: I believe we settled on 3 artifacts: apache/sdap-nexus-webapp apache/sdap-collection-manager apache/sdap-granule-ingester There was still some active discussion on if these should share a version number or not. For sake of argument, let's say they do. So tarball would be something like - apache-sdapv1.0.0 - sdap-nexus-webapp - source code - sdap-collection-manager - source code - sdap-granule-ingester - source code Github repos would all have v1.0.0 tags/releases Docker repos would all have v1.0.0 tag On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 3:52 PM Riley K. Kuttruff <rkkuttr...@cpp.edu> wrote: > Will there be a tarball corresponding to the Nexus & Ingester repos or > will both be consolidated into one tatball? > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > Get Outlook for Android<https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!ZRMOIRLeE1hNPtw9WaB5AvV0X9BaBL--SoWU92C5qURBd0xg3VmoN3fyYOAla-2hENc$ > > ________________________________ > From: Perez, Stepheny K (US 398F) <stepheny.k.pe...@jpl.nasa.gov.INVALID> > Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 3:47:25 PM > To: dev@sdap.apache.org <dev@sdap.apache.org> > Subject: Ex: [DISCUSS] Towards release 0.4.5a56 > > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to start the conversation regarding our first official Apache > release. From what I can tell, these are the major items that need to be > completed before we can move forward: > > > 1. Identify a release manager. Any volunteers? > > 2. Create release tarball > > 3. Write release notes > > 4. Write installation instructions from source (Riley Kuttruff has > started this work) > > 5. Push docker images to Dockerhub (and update quickstart with these > versions) > > Another important task before moving forward would be testing the latest > SDAP analysis image 0.4.5a56. I have personally used this version without > any issues. Has anyone else upgraded to this latest alpha version? > > Thank you! > Stepheny > CAUTION: This email was not sent from a Cal Poly Pomona service. Exercise > caution when clicking links or opening attachments. Please forward > suspicious email to suspectem...@cpp.edu<mailto:suspectem...@cpp.edu>. > >