OK, we'll have to update the release page to clarify there was never a real 3.1.0 release then.
But I'm not suggesting releasing 3.1.0 _because_ it was published accidentally. I'm suggesting we figure out normally whether we would have released it, and if so, great. If not, fine we must skip the version. On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 3:36 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Jacek, Sean, and Hyukjin. > > The release is a human-driven process. Everyone can make mistakes. > > For example, I released Apache Spark 2.2.3 with a missing pandoc, but we > didn't touch it because it's a community-blessed official version. > > https://pypi.org/project/pyspark/2.2.3/ > > For this incident, given the situation, I'm +1 for `Skipping 3.1.0 and > starting 3.1.1 RC1` instead of making it official. > > It's because > > 1. The vote is important in the Apache project management process. > The existing 3.1.0 artifacts in Maven Central are not a > community-blessed version. > 2. Since this is the first incident, we had better build a rule to handle > this kind of accident. > If we approve `3.1.0` because it's published accidently, it could be a > bad practice. > In the worst case, a release manager can publish Spark 10.1.1 > accidently in the future without votes. > > BTW, thank you, Hyukjin, for your all efforts to prepare 3.1.0 as a > release manager. > We know that you devote lots of your time to make it happen. > > Bests, > Dongjoon. > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:07 PM Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes, it was my mistake. I faced the same issue as INFRA-20651 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20651>, and it is worse in >> my case because I misunderstood that RC and releases are separately >> released out. >> Right after this, I filed an INFRA JIRA to revert this at INFRA-21266 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21266>. We can wait and see >> how it goes. >> >> Though, I know it’s impossible to remove by right. It is possible to >> overwrite but it will affect people who already have it in their cache. >> I am thinkthing two options: >> >> - Skip 3.1.0 and release 3.1.1 right away since the release isn’t >> officially out to the main Apache repo/mirrors but only one of the >> downstream channels. We can just say that there was something wrong during >> the 3.1.0 release so it became 3.1.1 right away. >> >> >> - Release 3.1.0 out, of course, based on the vote results here. We >> could release 3.1.1 fast that exceptionally allows a bit of breaking >> changes with properly documenting it in a release note and migration >> guide. >> >> I would appreciate it if I could hear other people' opinions. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >>
