+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:06 PM Felix Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Zhou Jiang <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 5, 2026 8:49 PM > *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Spark Connect Gateway — Session Affinity, > Auth, and Multi-Tenancy for Spark Connect Servers > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > On Aug 5, 2026, at 20:47, Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > Thank you, Liang-Chi. > > > > Dongjoon. > > > >> On 2026/08/06 02:57:50 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway". > >> > >> The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone, > >> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect > >> servers. > >> > >> The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the > feedback > >> raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling, > >> session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and the > >> backends, etc. > >> > >> - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455 > >> - SPIP doc: > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu > >> > >> Please vote on the SPIP: > >> > >> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because … > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Liang-Chi > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] > >
