+1 (non-binding) We operate an inhouse Spark Connect gateway in production, a wire compatible gRPC proxy fronting multi tenant Spark Connect servers with session affinity, so the problem statement here matches our experience exactly. We wrote about it on our engineering blog (in Korean): https://toss.tech/article/spark-connect-on-kubernetes-1
Happy to be involved from the start. Jiwon Park 2026. 8. 6. 오후 2:34, DB Tsai <[email protected]> 작성: +1 DB Tsai | https://www.dbtsai.com/ | PGP 0x9FB9FAA3 -------- Original Message -------- On Wednesday, 08/05/26 at 22:18 Jerry Tan <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Aug 5, 2026, at 6:33 PM, bo yang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:06 PM Felix Cheung <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1 ________________________________ From: Zhou Jiang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 8:49 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Spark Connect Gateway — Session Affinity, Auth, and Multi-Tenancy for Spark Connect Servers +1 (non-binding) > On Aug 5, 2026, at 20:47, Dongjoon Hyun > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > +1 > > Thank you, Liang-Chi. > > Dongjoon. > >> On 2026/08/06 02:57:50 "L. C. Hsieh" wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway". >> >> The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone, >> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect >> servers. >> >> The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the feedback >> raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling, >> session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and the >> backends, etc. >> >> - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455 >> - SPIP doc: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu >> >> Please vote on the SPIP: >> >> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because … >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Thanks! >> Liang-Chi >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <publickey - [email protected] - 0x9FB9FAA3.asc>
