+1 I have reviewed the codebase and found it to be an excellent reference implementation. This SPIP will be a highly valuable addition to the Spark Connect ecosystem Regards, Viquar Khan
On Thu, Aug 6, 2026, 2:11 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 10:28 AM Xiao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 06:10写道： >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 8:31 PM Bobby Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (Non-binding) >>>> >>>> Qiegang Long <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 19:34写道： >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026, 10:58 PM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway". >>>>>> >>>>>> The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone, >>>>>> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect >>>>>> servers. >>>>>> >>>>>> The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the >>>>>> feedback raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling, >>>>>> session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and >>>>>> the backends, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455 >>>>>> - SPIP doc: >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because … >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>> Liang-Chi >>>>>> >>>>>>
