+1 (non-binding)

On Aug 6, 2026 at 4:27 PM -0700, vaquar khan <[email protected]>, wrote:

+1

I have reviewed the codebase and found it to be an excellent reference
implementation. This SPIP will be a highly valuable addition to the Spark
Connect ecosystem
Regards,
Viquar Khan


On Thu, Aug 6, 2026, 2:11 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 10:28 AM Xiao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 06:10写道:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 8:31 PM Bobby Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (Non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Qiegang Long <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 19:34写道:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026, 10:58 PM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone,
>>>>>> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect
>>>>>> servers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the
>>>>>> feedback raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling,
>>>>>>   session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and
>>>>>> the backends, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455
>>>>>> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FSPARK-58455&data=05%7C02%7Cyiconghuang%40umass.edu%7Cb226d352181a445365a908def41248f2%7C7bd08b0b33954dc194bbd0b2e56a497f%7C0%7C0%7C639216556584965196%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nLRmmw3O8ErISO6u1C2kE9PM4EfYZJpmRFSGwpRUsTE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>   - SPIP doc:
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu
>>>>>> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c%2Fedit%3Ftab%3Dt.0%23heading%3Dh.221xxblzqzu&data=05%7C02%7Cyiconghuang%40umass.edu%7Cb226d352181a445365a908def41248f2%7C7bd08b0b33954dc194bbd0b2e56a497f%7C0%7C0%7C639216556584981007%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=i3FZ8hRsiRZcfqQQxLwM7EiEvs8wP475YNjOBC2w2q0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Please vote on the SPIP:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   [ ] +1 Accept the proposal
>>>>>>   [ ] +0
>>>>>>   [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because …
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Thanks!
>>>>>>   Liang-Chi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Best regards,
Yicong Huang

Reply via email to