+1 (non binding) On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 10:28 AM Xiao Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 06:10写道： > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 8:31 PM Bobby Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (Non-binding) >>> >>> Qiegang Long <[email protected]> 于2026年8月6日周四 19:34写道： >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026, 10:58 PM L. C. Hsieh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to start the vote for the SPIP "Spark Connect Gateway". >>>>> >>>>> The SPIP proposes an official Spark Connect Gateway — a standalone, >>>>> wire-compatible gRPC proxy that sits in front of a pool of Spark Connect >>>>> servers. >>>>> >>>>> The SPIP document has been updated along the way to address the >>>>> feedback raised in the discussion thread, including protocol coupling, >>>>> session-loss semantics, the trust boundary between the gateway and >>>>> the backends, etc. >>>>> >>>>> - JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58455 >>>>> - SPIP doc: >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16RNnRJjSDBSlcgeBjVz_Mv-SkqvH33F9tIsR1Ii_P3c/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.221xxblzqzu >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on the SPIP: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Accept the proposal >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 I don't think this is a good idea because … >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Liang-Chi >>>>> >>>>>
